Wood Expressions Sues Sellers for Trademark Infringement

Apr 13, 2024

Wood Expressions Sues Sellers for Alleged Counterfeiting

Wood Expressions, the international board game entertainment company, is claiming online sellers have infringed on their trademarks. Are you one of the Defendants in the case? If you got notice that your business is being sued by Wood Expressions for trademark infringement, you’ll need to act accordingly. Principally, you should respond to the lawsuit! The case is very real and not something you can ignore with the hope that it just vanishes. 

The allegations made by Wood Expressions amount to claims that a wide-ranging network of online sellers have engaged in counterfeiting. As such, all of the Defendants ought to take the matter extremely seriously. It’s going to impact your business, if it hasn’t already. Schedule A infringement cases like this one filed in Illinois develop based on a sort of playbook. Once the Plaintiff files the case, the attorney working on their behalf motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Once approved, the TRO takes effect and puts a freeze on the money in the Defendants’ online selling accounts. What does that mean for you? Your access to the money you’ve earned from selling Wood Expressions products is restricted. You can’t touch it. 

What follows this is that the Plaintiff will typically try and settle with the Defendants. Wood Expressions will likely contact each of the sellers named in the suit. If a settlement is reached, Wood Expressions drops the allegations and the seller can regain access to their money. What sellers need to know is that settlements often permit sellers to only keep about 60% of their money. Which is not the best outcome! Online sellers frequently struggle to stay afloat and every bit of cash flow can be the difference between success and going under. 

What Happens If You Ignore the Lawsuit?

Now, some sellers may consider that just leaving the case alone and not responding may be a good strategy. Walking away from the lawsuit will mean that any money frozen in your account will be awarded to Wood Expressions. A total loss, in other words. That move could also result in a Default Judgment, which will cost you even more money and damage to your business. 

What’s the most sensible way to approach handling this trademark infringement lawsuit? For most online sellers, retaining an intellectual property attorney gives them a great deal of power. An IP attorney can respond to the court for you, use the details of your business to counter argue against the allegations, and/or land on a settlement that provides you with a percentage of money that is more robust than you would get if dealing directly with the Plaintiff yourself. 

We have little doubt that you are interested in losing money. Why would anyone want that! Don’t unnecessarily inflict your business with any further damage. If you don’t know the United States legal system that well, that’s ok! Your attorney will and knows just how to navigate the process of resolution. Maybe you’re intimidated or confused by the notice that you’re being sued for something you don’t believe you did. Your attorney can fight against the Plaintiff’s claims, so you won’t have to. Most online sellers dealing with a trademark infringement case benefit from investing in an IP attorney to address the allegations made against their business. 

The Claims Made Against Sellers | Alleged Trademark Infringement

The legal complaint describes the “Unlawful Conduct” of the Defendants in the following ways (excerpted): 

Wood Expressions has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering Counterfeit Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, and Temu including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. 

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the WOOD EXPRESSIONS Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Wood Expressions Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using the WOOD EXPRESSIONS Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Wood Expressions Products.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants are in constant communication with each other and regularly participate in QQ.com chat rooms and through websites such as sellerdefense.cn and kuajingvs.com regarding tactics for operating multiple accounts, evading detection, pending litigation, and potential new lawsuits. 

Wood Expressions is a major board game company. With any globally successful brand, counterfeiting will occur. However, just because someone infringed on the Plaintiff’s trademarks willingly, that doesn’t mean you did. In any event, if you’re one of the Defendants, you should strongly look into taking legal action. By retaining an attorney, you will greatly increase your chances at coming out the other end with enough resources to survive the blow and continue to thrive in the marketplace. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today! We offer a free consultation. Once we understand the details of your business, we can get straight to work on determining an effective legal strategy that aims to resolve the issue with the least amount of frustration.

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Tory Burch Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here