What is a TRO in Business? The Definition and Effects of a Temporary Restraining Order

Apr 20, 2024

What is a TRO in Business? Online Sellers and Temporary Restraining Orders

Have you ever heard of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)? If your business deals with various kinds of intellectual property, then you probably have! A TRO is a legal document put forth by a judge prior to trial. It stops a certain action for a set amount of time. We regularly post about trademark, copyright, and patent infringement cases on our site. This is one of the main instances where a temporary restraining order is issued. 

When approved by a judge, a TRO stops Defendants from further infringement on a Plaintiff’s intellectual property. The temporary nature of the restraining order refers to the amount of time between the issuance of the TRO and a preliminary junction. For example, if evidence of trademark infringement is submitted to a federal court, that court can process a request to take an immediate action based on that evidence. And that’s when the TRO goes into effect. 

The truth is, lawsuits over intellectual property can take a lot of time and resources. For this reason, Plaintiffs often want immediate relief. For a judge to issue a TRO, specific criteria must be met in terms of the evidence and allegations. Regarding intellectual property lawsuits… The court usually needs to see evidence that there will be a likelihood of further damage to the Plaintiff. Which might be irreparable without an expedited remedy (such as a restraining order). 

E-Commerce Stores, Federal Infringement Lawsuits | What is a TRO in Business?

Online sellers use major platforms like Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, and/or Temu. They are often the targets of temporary restraining orders. In a federal trademark, copyright, or patent infringement case, the Plaintiff files a lawsuit against sellers. Frequently, the Defendants are named in a Schedule A lawsuit. This means many sellers are accused of infringement at the same time. The allegations of unlawful conduct made by the Plaintiff against the Defendants are usually very similar.

Major brands file Schedule A lawsuits to counteract what they believe is widespread counterfeiting of their products. The brands often claim online sellers are working together to infringe on intellectual property. Allegations include: 

  • The identification of e-commerce stores that offer counterfeit products on multiple online marketplace platforms, using seller aliases. 
  • The deception of unsuspecting consumers by using unauthorized intellectual property (trademarks, copyrights). That is, within the content, text, or meta tags of e-commerce stores. Sellers do so to manipulate search engine rankings in favor of the unauthorized sellers. 
  • The omission of the intellectual property allegedly infringed on in the title of products so as to evade enforcement. 
  • The communication between the Defendants in a given case on a constant basis, using chat rooms and websites to share tactics for how to successfully counterfeit products and infringe on intellectual property without being detected. 
  • Online sellers design their e-commerce stores to appear as authorized sellers of trademark/copyright protected products, so as to grab consumers and fool them into buying counterfeit goods. 

How a TRO Can Impact an Online Business | Claims of Intellectual Property Infringement

The above is just a selection of the type of claims brands make against online sellers in federal intellectual property lawsuits. Regardless, because Plaintiffs submit these allegations with supporting evidence to the judge, it gives them the power to request a temporary restraining order (TRO) at the beginning of the process until the time of the preliminary junction. And what does that mean for the online sellers who are named as Defendants in these cases? In short, the sellers’ account(s) will be frozen and they won’t be able to access the money in their accounts. 

A temporary restraining order in a federal intellectual property lawsuit prevents sellers from touching the money they earned from selling the Plaintiff’s products. The TRO may also impact the sellers’ ability to access money earned from the sale of other branded products. This is no small matter! An online selling business can be put at risk of bankruptcy due to a temporary restraining order. Sellers need as much cash flow and resources as possible to operate. When they are barred from accessing their money, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, that can really put sellers in a precarious position. 

What to Do When You are Hit With a TRO?

So what do sellers do when they are hit with a TRO due to allegations of infringement and counterfeiting? In some instances, the Defendants accept a settlement offer made by the Plaintiff. This isn’t typically the most favorable option for how to proceed, though, because these settlements often leave the online seller with only 60% of their money – no matter if the allegations are true or false. If that settlement is accepted, the remaining amount of the money frozen by the restraining order is awarded to the Plaintiff. 

What else can online sellers do when they’re subjected to the severe impact of a temporary restraining order? Seek legal counsel! An intellectual property attorney can help online sellers affected by TROs in several ways. First, it’s possible that a lawyer can prove to the court that you didn’t actually engage in the infringement as alleged. Second, an attorney can come up with a legal resolution and/or settlement strategy that gives you the power to keep more of your money than if you worked directly with the Plaintiff suing you. And, a lawyer can essentially guide you through how to navigate the process of responding to every part of the lawsuit as it unfolds so that ultimately you make it out the other side with your business and finances intact! 

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC | Intellectual Property Attorneys Who Can Help!

Has your online business been affected by a temporary restraining order? Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today! We offer a free consultation. Once we understand your situation, we can develop a legal solution that works best for you and your business.

Up next we will be discussing Paralegal Services Vs. Attorneys.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here