Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC) Suing E-Commerce Sellers

Jun 26, 2024

E-Commerce Sellers Sued by Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC)

Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC) has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit! According to CLC, counterfeit versions of their licensed products were sold on the marketplace. The online sellers who allegedly offered these goods are the ones being sued. As stated in the legal complaint, the trademark infringement was carried out by one or more than one of the many Defendants named in the lawsuit. These sellers are all getting sued at the same time because this is a Schedule A lawsuit, which allows for that. 

Interestingly, CLC is a “trademark licensing and enforcement agent that represents more than 700 colleges, universities, bowl games, collegiate athletic conferences and other brands, including the University of Alabama, the University of Kansas, and the University of Michigan.” Schedule A lawsuits more typically get filed by big commercial brands, like Nike, Toyota, the NBA, Harley-Davidson, and so on. In this case, it’s a company that facilitates the licensing and enforcement of trademarks for colleges and related brands. CLC contends that the online sellers who committed the infringement sold unauthorized products that are trademark protected. Those products include apparel, caps, jerseys, and more. 

CLC Claims Sellers Offered Unauthorized Goods to Consumers

CLC claims that their revenue is generated through the sale of their authorized collegiate goods. And, due to the selling of unauthorized, counterfeit products by the Defendants, the CLC has been “significantly damaged” and they have suffered “financial and irreparable harm.” Further, the Plaintiff asserts that their clients own the trademarks in question and collaborate with CLC when addressing licensing and protection of the intellectual property. That goes for trademarks, names, symbols, trade dress colors, designs, emblems, and logos. 

If you’ve received notice that your online business is getting sued as part of the CLC lawsuit, you should hire an intellectual property attorney immediately! Stressing out over the existence of the lawsuit and/or panicking because you’re not sure what to do – that’s unnecessary. An attorney can walk you through the legal process of handling this matter step by step. Ultimately, they’ll get your business back on its feet so that you can continue on your path of success. 

Per the lawsuit, the Defendants have been identified as businesses and/or individuals who run online stores under several “seller aliases.” So far as the Plaintiff believes, these sellers are based in China or other places outside the United States. From these locations, it’s alleged that the Defendants have sold various CLC protected products and infringed on those properties. 

The Allegations of Trademark Infringement…

The allegations of trademark infringement, in part, read as follows:

The fame of CLC Protected Trademarks and affiliated variety of licensed products, including apparel, hats, jewelry, toys, furniture, pennants, and bags, among others (collectively, the “Genuine CLC Products”), has resulted in significant counterfeiting of CLC Protected Trademarks

In addition to other significant enforcement measures, CLC is a member of the Coalition to Advance the Protection of Sports Logos (“CAPS”), which is administered by Trademark Management LLC. CAPS has created an extensive anti-counterfeiting program, which includes regularly investigating suspicious e-commerce stores identified in proactive Internet sweeps and reported by a variety of informants in response to the significant counterfeiting of CLC Protected Trademarks.

Defendants concurrently employ and benefit from substantially similar advertising and marketing strategies. For example, Defendants facilitate sales of Counterfeit Products by designing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers, including, in many instances, by copying the layouts, terms of service, legal notices and/or contact information found on the websites of Plaintiff’s authorized online retailers.

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using one or more CLC Protected Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta-tags of their e- commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Genuine CLC Products

The CLC Counterfeit Lawsuit is “Schedule A”

As we mentioned, this is a Schedule A infringement lawsuit. In most of these cases, the Plaintiff tries to settle directly with as many Defendants as they can. Maybe you or another named seller will want to take a direct settlement, so you can quickly resolve this issue. While the speed of that decision may be attractive, the outcome might not be! Most Schedule A direct settlements leave the Defendants with less than what they deserve. 

Here’s how it works. After the Plaintiff files the lawsuit, they’ll request that the court approve a temporary restraining order (TRO). After that’s approved, the sellers’ online accounts will be frozen by the TRO. The Defendants will then be blocked from accessing the money in their seller accounts. The reason behind the Plaintiff’s decision to get a restraining order is so that they can stop the alleged counterfeiting. The byproduct of the TRO is that the Defendants are put into a tough financial position. To both survive the lawsuit and thereafter thrive as a business, you’ll want to hire an intellectual property attorney! 

For any affected seller who is considering ignoring the lawsuit, please don’t! You need to respond to the lawsuit. And, figure out an effective legal strategy for settlement or negotiation, so that your business can move forward. That’s why having an intellectual property attorney on your side is so essential. They can take care of everything you and your business requires to get past this roadblock. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation! We’re eager to learn about your particular situation so that we can develop a tailor-made legal solution just for you. 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Nike Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here