Lawsuit Filed by Owner of Peanuts Intellectual Property

Jul 1, 2024

Online Sellers Sued by Peanuts Worldwide LLC

Charlie Brown, Snoopy, Woodstock, Lucy, Linus, and Sally… These aren’t just random names, which you probably know, they’re the names of famous Peanuts characters! The owner of the Peanuts trademark and copyright, Peanuts Worldwide LLC, has just filed a lawsuit claiming intellectual property infringement. 

Peanuts Worldwide LLC says online sellers, referred to as Defendants, have used their e-commerce stores to sell counterfeit Peanut products. In doing just that, allegedly, these sellers have infringed on the Plaintiff’s federally registered trademarks and copyrighted works. While these accusations of trademark and copyright infringement haven’t been proven, they still definitely affect the named online sellers! 

If you’re confused about why Peanuts Worldwide LLC filed this counterfeit lawsuit, that’s ok! It’s because they believe the supposed infringement has cost them money. To counter the loss they’ve absorbed, Peanuts has decided that filing the suit will provide them with an opportunity to regain some of their money. To achieve that outcome, the Plaintiff has aimed particular allegations at the sellers. Once these claims have been established to the court, the Plaintiff will seek to get a temporary restraining order (TRO). The TRO will then prohibit the sellers from accessing the money in their online selling accounts! 

What Should Sellers Do After Getting Notified of the Lawsuit?

What are the Defendants supposed to do once they’ve been notified of the lawsuit? Or, after their accounts have been struck with a restraining order? Well, you first need to absolutely respond to the lawsuit. That’s essential to the process! A seller who fails to respond to the lawsuit could later have to deal with a Default Judgment. That will cost you even more money than the restraining order and usually isn’t easily overturned. So avoid that by just responding! After the TRO comes into play, as mentioned, you’ll be blocked from the money in your accounts.

It could be a major thing, depending on the status of your business prior to the lawsuit. Bankruptcy is also a potential with the restraining order. Some online sellers are already strained and a TRO could push them over the edge. All of these things considered, you’re going to need to hire an intellectual property attorney! 

Even if you’re scared by the lawsuit, that’s no reason to pretend it isn’t real or to ignore it! You have the power to do something and the most crucial decision will be hiring an attorney. You don’t necessarily need to know how to respond to the lawsuit. Your lawyer can take care of that for you. In terms of understanding the intricacies of the legal system in the United States – that’s a job for your attorney! The cost of retaining counsel will be worth it in the long term because this is not an issue that will just go away independent of your actions. You may even end up saving money because you hired a lawyer at the right time. 

Should Sellers Reach a Direct Settlement with Peanuts Worldwide?

Peanuts Worldwide LLC, like many brands in their position, will attempt to settle directly with the sellers. Since this is a Schedule A lawsuit, the intellectual property owner is suing the Defendants as a group or network, as opposed to one by one on an individual basis. The Plaintiff’s strategy will likely fall in line with what’s typical with other Schedule A lawsuits. That is, their strategy will be to settle directly with as many sellers as they can. By doing that, the Plaintiff can regain the most amount of money.

While any of the named sellers can reach a settlement with Peanuts Worldwide LLC, it might not be in their best interest. The benefit of a direct settlement is that it’ll wrap up the issues caused by the lawsuit pretty quickly. But, the majority of these kinds of settlements only provide sellers with just over half of their hard-earned capital. Having a lawyer negotiate with Peanuts Worldwide LLC for you will likely improve your financial outcome overall! That’s why hiring an intellectual property attorney is worth it. 

Peanuts Infringement Lawsuit Allegations…

Let’s check out some of the Plaintiff’s allegations below:

Defendants are individuals and business entities of unknown makeup who own and/or operate one or more of the e-commerce stores under at least the Seller Aliases identified on Schedule A and/or other seller aliases not yet known to Plaintiff. On information and belief, Defendants reside and/or operate in the People’s Republic of China or other foreign jurisdictions with lax trademark enforcement systems or redistribute products from the same or similar sources in those locations.

Defendants concurrently employ and benefit from substantially similar advertising and marketing strategies. For example, Defendants facilitate sales by designing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases appear sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the PEANUTS Trademarks or copy or distribute the Peanuts Copyrighted Works, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Peanuts Products.

Contact Stockman & Poropat, PLLC!!!

Are you an online seller affected by the federal Peanuts Worldwide LLC trademark and copyright lawsuit? 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC for a free initial consultation! Our attorneys are uniquely experienced in this area of intellectual property law and can help you and your business.  

Up next we will be discussing the latest Birkenstock Counterfeit Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here