Nike Claims Trademark Infringement | Online Sellers Sued

Aug 6, 2024

Online Sellers Sued by Nike for Trademark Infringement

Nike, the global footwear and athletic brand that virtually everyone knows, is suing online sellers for trademark infringement! The allegations made against e-commerce sellers claim that a network of counterfeiters has infringed on Nike’s intellectual property. If you’re one of the sellers identified in the lawsuit, your online business will be affected! 

Let’s examine a selection of Nike’s trademark infringement allegations:

Nike has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering Counterfeit Nike Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, Temu, and DHgate, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases.

Defendants facilitate sales by designing e- commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers. E-commerce stores operating under Seller Aliases appear sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants regularly register or acquire new seller aliases for the purpose of offering for sale and selling Counterfeit Nike Products. Such seller alias registration patterns are one of many common tactics used by e-commerce store operators like Defendants to conceal their identities and the full scope and interworking of their counterfeiting operations, and to avoid being shut down.

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple seller aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation in spite of Nike’s enforcement. E- commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court in an attempt to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded by the Court

Why Are Sellers Being Sued by Nike?

What does all of that mean?! Let’s break it down. Nike is filing the lawsuit because they believe the alleged network of counterfeiters is damaging their brand. In the process of doing so, the supposed infringement has cost Nike a significant amount of money. And, they are suing a group of online sellers in this single action. That’s so they can stop the sellers from offering any more counterfeit goods on the marketplace. As a “Schedule A” lawsuit, the Plaintiff has the power to attempt to reach settlements with the sellers directly. Ultimately, the decision to settle with Nike is up to each Defendant. But if you’re looking at that option, you may want to carefully weigh the pros and cons of that decision! 

One thing the sellers really don’t have much choice about is providing a response to the court. That’s a top priority! You’ll want to respond to the court. Avoid getting caught up in a Default Judgment, which will be even more expensive and complicated. This is a federal lawsuit that will impact your business, so you need to respond! The Nike infringement lawsuit might be extremely frustrating. In any event, you have to address the reality of it to move forward. 

Respond! Avoid a Default Judgment

Are you worried that you’re not informed on how to precisely respond to the court? Or, are you just totally confused about why you’re even being sued for infringement? Perhaps you don’t know which step to take first and/or what type of negotiation you should attempt with Nike… Any seller affected by this Nike counterfeit lawsuit should hire an intellectual property attorney! Your lawyer can guide you through what you’ll need to do so that you can maintain your business. Trademark infringement and the United States legal system can be a difficult thing to navigate on your own. From response to negotiation to resolution – your lawyer will be an invaluable asset!

Why can’t one of the Defendants just settle with Nike on their own and go from there? You absolutely can, but the majority of direct settlements in Schedule A cases result in sellers getting to keep less of their money than they deserve. This is where having an intellectual property attorney especially comes in handy! 

How Nike’s Restraining Order Will Affect Sellers

Once approved by the court, Nike will impose a temporary restraining order on the Defendant’s seller accounts. That will freeze the money in the seller accounts. You won’t be able to gain access to the money you yourself earned! When you settle with Nike, if you choose to do that, they’ll likely leave you with just about 60% of that frozen money. E-commerce operators often rely on every bit of their capital to operate. Having a restraining order interrupt your daily operation can put a great amount of stress on you and your business. By hiring an intellectual property attorney, you can both address the allegations and reach a resolution in the most effective way. 

Even though the claims made by Nike are allegations, the real-world impact of the claims will possibly disrupt your business and cost you money. Every seller’s method for finding a resolution may differ, but most will benefit from utilizing the services of an attorney. If you want to diminish the amount of damage the Nike infringement lawsuit will have on your online business, retain a lawyer today.

Are you being affected by the Nike trademark infringement lawsuit? Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC for a free consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below: 

Up next we will be discussing the Hallmark Trademark and Copyright Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here