Eagles Sues Online Sellers For Infringing on IP

Aug 22, 2024

Online Sellers Sued by Eagles Trademark Owners for Infringement

The Grammy-winning American Classic Rock band the Eagles is suing online sellers for trademark infringement. The Plaintiff has filed a lawsuit in federal court. They hope to stop e-commerce operators from selling goods with counterfeit versions of their trademarks on them. What will happen to the sellers listed on “Schedule A” ? The sellers identified in the suit will be affected by a temporary restraining order! 

The Eagles trademark lawsuit will lead to a restraining order against the named sellers’ online accounts. The sellers accused of offering counterfeit Eagles products will not have access to the money they earned from selling those products. The Plaintiff’s aim is to put a freeze on the sellers’ accounts to halt the infringement from happening. According to the owners of the Eagles intellectual property, the Defendants’ actions have resulted in damage to the Eagles trademarks. 

What about the damage caused to your business because of the Eagles lawsuit and the restraining order? And, are all of the sellers being fairly targeted by the lawsuit? If you’re one of the Defendants, you might be asking these very questions. To address the impact of the restraining order and/or the fairness of the claims, you’ll want to consult with an intellectual property attorney! Is there any possibility that the allegations in the suit don’t apply to you and your online selling business? An attorney can help determine that in a legal context. Likewise, if any of the sellers want to reduce the impact of the restraining order, seeking the aid of a lawyer will be the most productive route to take. 

Allegations Result in Temporary Restraining Order

While the statements detailed in the legal complaint are allegations, the lawsuit affects sellers regardless. Maybe you know that the claims of trademark infringement don’t apply to you. Nevertheless, you’ll still have to respond to the lawsuit. Whether sellers have actually sold counterfeit Eagles products or not, if they’ve been named, they’ll be affected. For these reasons and more, hiring an intellectual property attorney is going to be very beneficial. 

As mentioned, sellers will have to respond to the lawsuit in order to move forward. The absence of a response could lead to a Default Judgment. Best to avoid that outcome! Once you respond, then you’ll have a chance to enter into negotiations with the Plaintiff. In the case of those sellers who want to settle directly with DG Eagles IP LLC, you certainly may do so. Be aware, when sellers attempt to negotiate with Plaintiffs, without a lawyer, in these kinds of lawsuits they can be taken advantage of. You don’t want to settle for less than what you deserve, such as 60% of your frozen money, do you?! Having an intellectual property attorney to negotiate for you will likely result in better settlement outcomes for sellers. 

To really gain a full understanding of the lawsuit, sellers should read the legal complaint associated with the case (download at the end of this post). The following language constitutes a selection of the allegations of trademark infringement in the Eagles lawsuit: 

  • Defendants are working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have jointly and severally, knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the EAGLES Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet
  • Defendants’ unauthorized use of the EAGLES Trademarks in connection with the advertising, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products, including the sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States, including Illinois, is likely to cause and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception by and among consumers and is irreparably harming Plaintiff
  • Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of the EAGLES Trademarks. Plaintiff’s United States Registrations for the EAGLES Trademarks (Exhibit 1) are in full force and effect. On information and belief, Defendants have knowledge of Plaintiff’s rights in the EAGLES Trademarks, and are willfully infringing and intentionally using counterfeits of the EAGLES Trademarks. Defendants’ willful, intentional and unauthorized use of the EAGLES Trademarks is likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake, and deception as to the origin and quality of the Counterfeit Products among the general public

Respond, Negotiate, Hire an Attorney!

So, if you’re one of the e-commerce sellers whose account was frozen due to the Eagles infringement lawsuit? Consider the following. First, provide a response to the court so that a Default Judgment isn’t issued against you. Next, explore your options. That is, with regard to negotiations for a settlement with a Plaintiff so that you may continue operating your business. And lastly, hire an attorney to work with you throughout the entire legal process. All in all, having a lawyer to advise you on these matters will be the most effective and productive method. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Monster Energy Federal Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here