Alastin Skincare Sues Sellers For Trademark Infringement

Aug 27, 2024

Alastin Skincare Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

The majority of federal infringement lawsuits involve the implementation of a temporary restraining order. The recently filed Alastin Skincare trademark infringement suit is no different! Brands like Alastin want to protect their intellectual property. A restraining order is a very effective means for accomplishing just that. It’s one of the biggest interruptions to your online selling business, as well! Let’s engage with the details of the Alastin trademark infringement lawsuit with a little more depth below.

As noted, Alastin will request that the court approve a temporary restraining order. In most instances of federal intellectual property infringement, the court will approve that request. Then, the Defendants will be blocked from touching the money in their online selling accounts! Also, this gives the Plaintiff quite a bit of leverage to go forth with any possible direct settlements with the named sellers. Because you can’t access the money earned from the sale of Alastin products, you might be tempted to settle directly. Perhaps that seems enticing. Maybe that quick and ready option could alleviate the restraining order. But, with direct settlements sellers typically only walk away with 60% of their frozen money!

Federal Trademark Lawsuits Shouldn’t Be Underestimated

The seriousness of this federal trademark lawsuit shouldn’t be underestimated. This isn’t a situation that can be ignored whatsoever. The failure to respond to the lawsuit could even lead to a more complicated predicament, involving a potential Default Judgment. Not to mention, you could lose your own hard-earned money! There’s not much reason to just forfeit all of your money to the Plaintiff. As we noted above, the restraining order should give affected sellers plenty of motivation to take action. And what’s the most productive type of action to take? Hiring an intellectual property lawyer!

Insofar as the response is concerned, sellers must provide one to avoid the Default Judgment outcome. Don’t let any frustration or intimidation you might be experiencing get in the way of that response. Also, not to worry if you’re not versed in what that response should look like. Your attorney can compose the response on your behalf! As your attorney, we’ll be working with you all along the way, so that you understand Alastin’s allegations of infringement and how you should address them. Overwhelmingly, our aim is to get your online selling business back on track and in rhythm so that you can continue making money!

One of the better ways to approach the lawsuit is by way of the legal complaint itself. Sellers can educate themselves on the claims of infringement and counterfeiting simply by reading the complaint. Sure, a good amount of the language therein is legalese and/or not easily comprehensible to the layperson. However, even gaining a general overview of the allegations made against your business is worthwhile. Don’t let the fact that you’re not an attorney, or that your business is based in China or another country outside the United States, stop you from getting the legal representation you deserve!

Why Is Alastin Suing Online Sellers?

All in all, Alastin Skincare has filed a lawsuit naming online sellers as alleged infringers on their intellectual property. Ostensibly, the Plaintiff wants to implement a temporary restraining order so that the Defendants can’t sell any more counterfeit goods online. Know that the allegations aren’t equivalent to guilt of the described actions! The lawsuit consists of claims, which need to be addressed, responded to, and possibly negotiated. If you’re a seller involved in this lawsuit and want to maintain as much of your money as you can, work with our team of attorneys! We can develop a creative legal solution just for you.

Alastin Skincare’s Allegations of Trademark Infringement

The following excerpts from the Alastin lawsuit legal complaint provide additional details regarding the infringement allegations:

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the ALASTIN Trademarks and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of Alastin Products. 

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the ALASTIN Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Alastin Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using ALASTIN Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts, while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Alastin Products. 

Defendants are working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have jointly and severally, knowingly, and willfully used and continue to use the ALASTIN Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the UGG, Hoka, and Teva Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here