Converse Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Oct 8, 2024

Converse Suing Online Sellers for Infringement

The footwear brand Converse is suing online sellers for trademark infringement! The Schedule A lawsuit was recently filed in federal court. Converse allegest that several e-commerce sellers have worked as a network to actively sell counterfeit goods online. Like many other similar infringement lawsuits, this one claims that the Defendants have damaged the reputation of the brand. So far as Converse is concerned, the allegedly unlawful actions of the named sellers has cost the company money. To counteract what is believed to be rampant counterfeiting, Converse filed the lawsuit. 

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the Converse trademark lawsuit, we can turn to the legal complaint. The notice describes all of the alleged infringement enacted by the Defendants. Are the claims of counterfeit unique in their description or character? Not really! There are many allegations in the Converse lawsuit. And the claims bear a close resemblance to other lawsuits we’ve written about on this blog in the past. That’s due to an increase in the filing of such lawsuits within the last three years. Specifically, in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. 

Converse Claims Network of Counterfeiting

Here are some of the allegations of trademark infringement, taken directly from the legal complaint:

Defendants’ unauthorized use of the Converse Trademarks in connection with the advertising, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Converse Products, including the sale of Counterfeit Converse Products into the United States, including Illinois, is likely to cause and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception by and among consumers and is irreparably harming Converse.

This is a trademark infringement action against Defendants based on their unauthorized use in commerce of counterfeit imitations of the federally registered Converse Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, and/or advertising of infringing goods. The Converse Trademarks are highly distinctive marks. Consumers have come to expect the highest quality from Converse Products offered, sold or marketed under the Converse Trademarks. 

Converse is the owner of the Converse Trademarks. Converse’s United States Registrations for the Converse Trademarks (Exhibit 1) are in full force and effect. On information and belief, Defendants have knowledge of Converse’s rights in the Converse Trademarks and are willfully infringing and intentionally using counterfeits of the Converse Trademarks. Defendants’ willful, intentional and unauthorized use of the Converse Trademarks is likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake, and deception as to the origin and quality of the Counterfeit Converse Products among the general public. 

Nervous About Being Sued?

Per the Plaintiff, the marks sellers have infringed on include Converse, Skidgrip, All Star, Cons, Converse.com, Weapon, First Star, Chuck Taylor, and more. The counterfeit goods, meanwhile, were apparently sold on eBay, Walmart, Amazon, Wish.com, Etsy, and DHgate, to name a few. 

We’ve successfully worked with many sellers around the world to help them navigate infringement lawsuits. It may happen that a selection of the Defendants are frightened or nervous. Because a brand like Converse is suing them. That is completely understandable. The Plaintiff is a big company with lots of resources. While the seller could very well be running a relatively small online business. In terms of power, from the outside looking in, or for the inexperienced, it might appear that the Defendants have no chance. That’s not the case! The sellers affected by this lawsuit do have a chance. Especially if they work with an intellectual property attorney! Having a tailor-made and well planned legal strategy is going to benefit you when responding to the Converse lawsuit. 

Before anything, you ought to provide a response to the court with regard to the lawsuit. Any seller who decides to either ignore the lawsuit or not respond could end up getting a Default Judgment issued against them. When that outcome presents itself, it can cost sellers additional money in damages. You need to respond to the lawsuit. If any given named seller isn’t sure how to create that response, an attorney can work with you to accomplish that. We don’t want to see sellers lose even more money because they didn’t submit a response. Our team can help! 

Addressing the Temporary Restraining Order

The primary disruption that the Converse trademark lawsuit will present to sellers will come by way of the temporary restraining order. That’s going to be approved by the court, more than likely. When the restraining order is in effect, sellers’ online accounts will be frozen, as well as the money in those accounts. For some, this could threaten to bankrupt their business. This is the main reason to treat the lawsuit as a serious matter. And, to resolve the temporary restraining order, you may want to settle with the Plaintiff. We would recommend working with an attorney, rather than negotiating yourself, because it will more often lead to a better settlement for you as the seller! 

For any seller getting sued by Converse, we suggest you seek out an intellectual property attorney! These sorts of federal counterfeit lawsuits shouldn’t be treated as a joke. They’re absolutely real and require action on the sellers’ part. We want to work with you so that we can make sure your business doesn’t needlessly lose money or its reputation. At the end of the day, you deserve to return to selling products to consumers who appreciate your online store. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:


Up next we will be discussing the latest Fiat Chrysler Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here