Jonas Brothers Sues For Trademark Infringement

Oct 26, 2024

Jonas Brothers Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Our team of intellectual property attorneys wants to help you deal with the new Jonas Brothers trademark lawsuit. Filed by the Plaintiff, Three Chord Strand Properties, LLC, the Jonas Brothers counterfeit lawsuit puts forth several allegations. In reality, the e-commerce sellers being sued will have to negotiate with the Plaintiff, possibly reach a settlement, and definitely have to respond to the court. If you’ve received notice that you’re one of the sellers listed on this Schedule A infringement lawsuit, please don’t ignore the situation! Instead, consider working with an IP lawyer so as to maintain the integrity of your business. 

If you’re a seller getting sued in the Jonas Brothers lawsuit, you’re not up the creek without a paddle. The named sellers have options – legal options to take action in response. Three Chord Strand Properties, LLC has a legal team, but that doesn’t mean sellers can’t also seek legal counsel. We strongly encourage any seller addressing such a situation to utilize the services of an attorney. And, the truth of the allegations? That all depends on the activity of each seller on an individual basis. Indeed, part of the claims made by the Jonas Brothers is that the sellers worked together to sell counterfeit products. However, just because these allegations have been made, doesn’t necessarily mean they apply to each named seller. 

Jonas Brothers Lawsuit and Temporary Restraining Orders

The Jonas Brothers trademark infringement lawsuit will result in a temporary restraining order. That restraining order will absolutely impact your e-commerce business. The injunction will put a freeze on your online seller accounts, blocking you from touching the money in those accounts. Without a doubt, the TRO can cause a lot of problems for online sellers. Obviously, not having access to your money can lead to issues, complications, and bankruptcy. And, part of the trouble with the lawsuit comes from the associated pressure to settle. 

Are you looking into trying to negotiate a direct settlement with the Plaintiff? While taking this route may be enticing because it could be a fast resolution, it might mean losing money. Don’t get us wrong, we sympathize with the desire to remove the restraining order from your accounts. Getting back to selling and making money is a no brainer. At the same time, our team of attorneys want you to get the resolution that you deserve, without unnecessarily losing capital. If you choose to work with an intellectual property attorney, they can negotiate for you and ensure you don’t hand over too big a chunk of your frozen funds. 

How Sellers Can Respond to the Jonas Brothers Lawsuit

The federal court in Illinois will approve the temporary restraining order. In nearly every Schedule A lawsuit, that’s how it unfolds. The TRO goes into effect, sellers feel the strain of the injunction, and then the Plaintiff attempts to directly settle with the sellers. The frozen money in your accounts was earned from selling Jonas Brothers products. Per the Plaintiff, you and the other sellers weren’t authorized to sell those goods. Jonas Brothers is suing the Defendants, they say, because the brand has lost a substantial amount of money due to counterfeiting. As you might imagine, if a “network” of infringers is actively trying to rip off your intellectual property, you may want to stop them. Again, the sellers named may not be guilty of such actions, but that’s what the Plaintiff believes. Since they’ve filed a lawsuit, now the sellers have to respond. 

Our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is unwaveringly dedicated to getting the best outcomes for our e-commerce clients. The creative legal strategies that we develop can deliver the type of resolution that you’re seeking. We want to get your business back in a position to thrive and make money, just like you do. The deep level of frustration online sellers feel when being sued for trademark infringement is something we understand very well. You’re not guilty of what the Jonas Brothers lawsuit says you did just because the allegations were made! We’ll undertake the responsibility of helping you navigate these legal waters. 

Jonas Brothers Allegations of Counterfeit Network

Here follows a few excerpts of the Jonas Brothers trademark infringement lawsuit. We encourage all of the Defendants to read through the legal complaint in full to review all of the allegations. Knowing what the Plaintiff has asserted will aid you in the process of responding and moving on with your business: 

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for e- commerce stores relevant to consumer searches for Jonas Brothers products. Other e-commerce stores operating under Seller Aliases omit using the JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Jonas Brothers products. 

This is a trademark infringement action against Defendants based on their unauthorized use in commerce of counterfeit imitations of the federally registered JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, and/or advertising of infringing goods. The JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks are highly distinctive marks. Consumers have come to expect the highest quality from products sold or marketed under the JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks.

By using the JONAS BROTHERS Trademarks in connection with the sale of Counterfeit Products, Defendants create a false designation of origin and a misleading representation of fact as to the origin and sponsorship of the Counterfeit Products. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Hallmark Licensing Trademark and Copyright Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here