Ralph Lauren Trademark and Copyright Action

Nov 20, 2024

PRL USA Holdings, LLC and Ralph Lauren Corporation Sue Online Sellers

Our incredible team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC has a unique approach when it comes to helping our clients with intellectual property matters. Of course, we offer legal counsel that’s backed by an uncommon breadth of experience. But we also want our clients to feel they’re working with a friendly team that’s eager to answer any questions you may have. When approaching IP infringement actions, online sellers may feel flustered, confused, or aggravated. In response to this, our team aims to deliver a virtually seamless level of service! 

Today, we’ll be covering the newest PRL USA Holdings, LLC and Ralph Lauren Corporation trademark and copyright lawsuit. In the legal complaint, you can find all of the details of the Plaintiff’s allegations. This is a great place to start if you’re not sure why you’re being sued! Taking an in-depth look into the claims of infringement is worthwhile. Here’s a selection of the trademark and copyright allegations: 

This action has been filed by Ralph Lauren to combat e-commerce store operators who trade upon Ralph Lauren’s reputation and goodwill by selling and/or offering for sale unauthorized and unlicensed products, including clothing and handbags, using infringing and counterfeit versions of Ralph Lauren’s federally registered trademarks and/or unauthorized copies of Ralph Lauren’s federally registered copyrighted works. 

On information and belief, Defendants, either individually or jointly, operate one or more e-commerce stores under the Seller Aliases listed in Schedule A attached hereto. Tactics used by Defendants to conceal their identities and the full scope of their operation make it virtually impossible for Ralph Lauren to learn Defendants’ true identities and the exact interworking of their counterfeit network. 

In recent years, Ralph Lauren has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering counterfeit Ralph Lauren Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Wish.com, Walmart, DHgate, Etsy, Temu, and TikTok, including the e- commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. 

Can Sellers Address the Ralph Lauren Lawsuit Without an Attorney?

Can e-commerce operators affected by the Ralph Lauren lawsuit address the case without an attorney? You may choose to do so, however you’re more likely to run into some unfairness with that decision. We want you to get the best resolution that you can! To clarify what we’re talking about, the main struggle online sellers will face with the Ralph Lauren infringement lawsuit is the temporary restraining order. That restraining order will implement a freeze on sellers’ marketplace accounts. Once that happens, some type of negotiation usually needs to take place. If and/or when one of the Defendants decides to attempt to negotiate with the Plaintiff directly, they may obtain a quick resolution. The fairness of the resolution, though, may not be so easily achieved. You’ll have greater opportunities for healthy outcomes when you work with an intellectual property attorney! 

When you work with our attorneys, you’ll be better equipped to address the lawsuit and the restraining order. Ralph Lauren is seeking the injunction to freeze the Defendants’ accounts because of counterfeiting. That’s the Plaintiff’s principal claim – that online sellers have worked individually and in connection with one another to sell infringing products to consumers. Schedule A lawsuits filed in federal court often cite this belief. “Schedule A” refers to the type of lawsuit in which the Plaintiff can sue multiple Defendants at once. In effect, Ralph Lauren has the power to attempt to stop the ongoing counterfeiting. That power manifests as the lawsuit. And, the court will approve the restraining order. Ralph Lauren’s claim is that the Defendants have cost them money and hurt their reputation. And our team wants to defend you against these allegations! 

Having a tailor-made legal strategy and an attorney to support it will be beneficial for sellers named in the Ralph Lauren lawsuit. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendants engaged in trademark and copyright infringement has to be addressed. You can’t just willfully turn a blind eye to the lawsuit and hope it vanishes on its own. That’s simply an impractical move! To ultimately save yourself money and time, you’ll want to respond to the lawsuit. Not responding isn’t even really an option to consider! By submitting a response, you’ll be able to avoid a Default Judgment, which is even more frustrating and costly. 

If you’re a Defendant in the latest Ralph Lauren trademark and copyright lawsuit, you should look into hiring an attorney! The Plaintiff will freeze your seller accounts and then try to settle with you directly so that they get the most from you. As your legal counsel, we’ll assess your e-commerce operation and obtain the best outcome available for you! This isn’t the time to press on full steam ahead without acknowledging the lawsuit. Don’t risk losing the money in your online seller accounts!  

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Levi’s Federal Intellectual Property Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here