Amorepacific Trademark Infringement Action

Dec 4, 2024

Amorepacific Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

The Korean-based beauty and cosmetics company Amorepacific is suing online sellers for trademark infringement! Firstly, the Defendants ought to provide a response to the lawsuit. By responding, you can be sure to stay clear of any sort of Default Judgment. To know the details and allegations of the Amorepacific lawsuit to the fullest extent, we can turn to the legal complaint. 

Here we’ll present a selection of Amorepacific’s allegations of intellectual property infringement. Be sure to read the entire legal complaint, which you may download at the end of this article: 

The success of the Amorepacific Brands has resulted in significant counterfeiting of the AMOREPACIFIC Trademarks. Consequently, Plaintiff has a worldwide anti- counterfeiting program and regularly investigates suspicious e-commerce stores identified in proactive Internet sweeps and reported by consumers.

[Sellers] are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the AMOREPACIFIC Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet.

Defendants have sold, offered to sell, marketed, distributed, and advertised, and are still selling, offering to sell, marketing, distributing, and advertising products using counterfeit reproductions of the AMOREPACIFIC Trademarks without Plaintiff’s permission. 

Amorepacific Claims Trademark Infringement

So, what’s going to happen to your business because of the Amorepacific trademark infringement lawsuit? The Plaintiff contends that the Defendants, comprised of a group of online sellers, sold counterfeit products to consumers. As such, Amorepacific claims that they’ve sustained significant losses in terms of finances and the brand’s reputation. Is Amorepacific going to sit idly by and just accept what they believe is intellectual property infringement? The answer to that question is no. While you may not believe that you’ve done what Amorepacific says, the Plaintiff still has the right to sue. 

Alrighty, so how’s the Amorepacific trademark lawsuit going to affect the name sellers? As you may have guessed, the Plaintiff will get a temporary restraining order approved. This particular legal move is geared toward sellers who’ve sold Amorepacific products because the Plaintiff wants to prevent further infringement. Look at it this way, the lawsuit is founded on a legitimate belief that unauthorized versions of Amorepacific goods were sold online. Given that, it’s in the Plaintiff’s best interest to do what they can to protect their brand. Are all of the Defendants equally guilty of the infringement as described in the complaint? Likely not, but they’ll all be impacted by the restraining order. 

Long Term Implications of Amorepacific Counterfeit Lawsuit

Instead of seeking the easiest way forward, or out, sellers should consider the long term implications. What’re we talking about? Settlements. If you’re one of the Defendants, you might want to try and directly settle with Amorepacific so you can move on lickity split. Sure, that’s an option for any of the named sellers. But, we’ve seen too many sellers get short-changed when it comes to direct settlements. Why would anyone willingly choose to accept a raw deal when they’re being sued for alleged trademark infringement? That sort of decision usually stems from the fact that the temporary restraining order results in your online seller accounts being frozen! 

Amorepacific Lawsuit Leads to Restraining Order

Rather than going for a direct settlement with Amorepacific wherein you’ll be walking away with around half of the money in your frozen account, you may consider hiring an intellectual property attorney! Stockman & Poropat, PLLC wants to see you get the resolution and outcome that your e-commerce business deserves. Our attorneys have an extraordinarily robust depth of experience in the e-commerce world when it comes to trademark infringement lawsuits. We’ve helped online sellers all across the globe who’ve been struck by these lawsuits. And we’re excited to come to your rescue, too! 

Our lawyers and team don’t want to see you unnecessarily take a settlement or reach any other resolution that isn’t fair! We’ll work with you to intricately understand the details of your e-commerce operation and seek the most sensible outcome. Lawsuits like this can plunge some sellers into bankruptcy, or otherwise thoroughly rattle your day-to-day business. The sooner you retain an attorney when dealing with a situation like this, the better. Lucky for you, our firm is efficient, communicative, and super friendly! If you’re concerned about how to act after being notified Amorepacific is suing you for trademark infringement, give us a call! 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Fox Racing Trademark Infringement Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here