Crye Precision Sues Sellers For Infringement

Dec 31, 2024

Federal Lawsuit: Crye Precision Trademark Infringement


Another brand is claiming that their intellectual property has been infringed on by e-commerce sellers! This federal counterfeit lawsuit was filed by Crye Precision. A brand recognized around the world for its tactical equipment and accessories. To grasp the full picture and to review the allegations of trademark infringement put forth by Crye Precision, we can look at the legal complaint.

Crye Precision Infringement Allegations


Here’s a few sections of the legal complaint, which sellers can read through the understand the Crye Precision infringement lawsuit:

Defendants are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the CRYE PRECISION Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet.

This is a trademark infringement action against Defendants based on their unauthorized use in commerce of counterfeit imitations of the federally registered CRYE PRECISION Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, and/or advertising of infringing goods. The CRYE PRECISION Trademarks are highly distinctive marks. Consumers have come to expect the highest quality from Crye Precision Products offered, sold, or marketed under the CRYE PRECISION Trademarks.

On information and belief, Defendants have knowledge of Plaintiff’s rights in the CRYE PRECISION Trademarks and are willfully infringing and intentionally using counterfeits of the CRYE PRECISION Trademarks. Defendants’ willful, intentional, and unauthorized use of the CRYE PRECISION Trademarks is likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake, and deception as to the origin and quality of the Counterfeit Products among the general public.

Are You Being Sued by Crye Precision?


Are you one of the e-commerce sellers being sued by Crye Precision for trademark infringement? Have you already considered what might be the quickest way forward? In Schedule A lawsuits like this, some sellers believe that they should try to reach a direct settlement with the Plaintiff. Sure enough, anyone affected by the suit has the option to pursue this sort of resolution. The Defendants ought to be informed, however, that notion of a direct settlement may not be beneficial for sellers. There’s a likelihood that sellers who negotiate with Crye Precision directly could only walk away with about half of their money! Our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC doesn’t want to see that happen unnecessarily. In fact, our attorneys will do all they can to get you the most robust and sensible outcome available!

So what’s really going to happen as a result of Crye Precision filing this federal trademark infringement lawsuit? A temporary injunction, more widely referred to as a temporary restraining order, will be approved. Once the court issues the injunction, sellers will be prohibited from accessing their online seller accounts. That’s correct, the accounts you’ve thus far been using to sell Crye Precision products will be frozen. Even though the accounts belong to the sellers, the lawsuit will make it so that they can’t access the money in them. More often than not, the restraining order is applied to money earned from the sale of the Plaintiff’s goods. Although, the freeze may also affect earnings made from selling non-Crye-Precision products, too!

Crye Precision Federal Lawsuit



Crye Precision has filed the lawsuit in federal court. They’re trying to stop the Defendants from selling unauthorized goods to consumers online. As noted earlier, the legal complaint can be used to identify and understand the details of the allegations. Crye Precision documented allegations related to what they believe. They assert that there’s a network of sellers doing all they can to continue selling counterfeit products. Per the Plaintiff, by incorporating tried-and-true methods of conducting these unlawful activities, the sellers have been able to get away with doing it thus far. Overall, Crye Precision is interested in possibly getting back some of the losses. Which they claim they suffered due to the sellers’ alleged actions.

The mere existence of Crye Precision’s allegations of infringement doesn’t mean that the Defendants actually engaged in the described actions. The nature of claims and/or allegations is that they’ve got to be proven! Which means, not every allegation of infringement will apply to each seller. Which is one of the main reasons you’ll want to hire an intellectual property attorney! If there’s any opportunity to seize on to clear your name, an IP lawyer can do that and get your business back on track. When you work with us at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we’ll create a specific legal strategy just for you!

Sellers Affected by the Crye Precision Suit Must Respond!



Another thing that sellers really must do is respond! Indeed, the lawsuit is predicated on allegations of infringement, but it still needs to be addressed in a timely manner. The absence of a response could give the court reason to issue a Default Judgment. If that occurs, you’ll have a more complicated legal situation that is more troublesome to overturn later on. And, a Default Judgment could end up costing even more money! Even if you haven’t done what Crye Precision says you did, you need to respond and figure out an appropriate resolution.

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the newest Tory Burch Trademark Infringement Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here