Spin Master Federal Infringement Lawsuit | Online Sellers Sued for Sale of Rubik’s Products
Are you being sued by Spin Master for selling Rubik’s products on an e-commerce marketplace? You ought to thoroughly consider hiring an intellectual property attorney! If you are under the impression that you may not be able to afford an IP lawyer, that may be short-sightedness. Sellers who don’t work with an attorney could see their business take an even greater loss. Our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC doesn’t want to see you take a major loss!
Unfortunately, sellers facing trademark infringement allegations in Schedule A lawsuits don’t typically get direct settlements that are reasonable or fair. So, if you’re a Defendant and you want to reach a direct settlement with Spin Master, without a lawyer, you are likely to get an unfair amount of your own money. The likelihood is that sellers who try to settle on their own will receive 60% of the funds in their accounts. Our firm is of the opinion that you deserve better! Which is why we look forward to working with you to navigate the Spin Master/Rubik’s infringement lawsuit. Our attorneys and superb team will invest the necessary amount of energy and tact into getting you the outcome you truly deserve.
Rubik’s Lawsuit and the Temporary Restraining Order
This Rubik’s trademark infringement lawsuit will come with a temporary restraining order. It’s the nature of Schedule A IP suits. The Plaintiff’s intention is to stop what they have determined is the alleged sale of counterfeit goods. The owner of the Rubik’s trademark doesn’t want their brand to be damaged any further than it supposedly has been. See, Spin Master claims that the sellers’ collective actions have been unlawful. What’s more, those unlawful actions as a “network” of counterfeiters have cost the Plaintiff money, they state. If you believed that was happening to your business, you might even do the same. But that’s not the case here! Sellers will be impacted by the temporary restraining order. That’s why being a prepared e-commerce seller is so darn important.
Rubik’s Trademark Infringement Lawsuit | How To Be Prepared…
How can sellers be best prepared for the TRO and other aspects of the Rubik’s trademark infringement lawsuit? Principally, by hiring an intellectual property attorney. The degree to which the restraining order will hurt a given seller’s business will depend. Whether it thrusts your e-commerce operation into bankruptcy or is a mere hiccup on your path to making millions – you deserve a fair resolution! How’s the restraining order going to disrupt your business? Once it’s approved by the court, sellers won’t be able to access their seller accounts. The money in your seller accounts – you won’t have the ability to touch it. Spin Master’s freeze on your seller accounts gives them the advantage when it comes to direct settlements, too. However, when you work with Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we’ll make sure no one takes advantage of you!
January 2025 Rubik’s Trademark Action
To gain a well-rounded perspective on just what the Spin Master/Rubik’s trademark suit means, we’ll take a look at the legal complaint. The complaint contains the totality of the intellectual property allegations. You can download the complaint at the end of this page. Here follows a few excerpts:
Spin Master has identified many fully interactive, e- commerce stores offering Counterfeit Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, Temu, and TikTok, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases.
E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Spin Master has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the RUBIK’S Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of Rubik’s Products.
Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using the RUBIK’S Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Rubik’s Products.
Defendants, without any authorization or license from Spin Master, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the RUBIK’S Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet.
Contact Stockman & Poropat, PLLC Today!
Overall, we want to impart that this latest Rubik’s trademark action isn’t something to ignore. The lawsuit is absolutely legitimate, has been filed in federal court, and required a response from the named Defendants. Are you one of the Defendants? If so, you need to provide a response! The failure to submit a response to the court regarding the Rubik’s lawsuit could result in a Default Judgment. No one wants to deal with a Default Judgment – the expense isn’t worth it and if you want to try and overturn it, you’ll have a really tough time doing so. By responding, staying informed of the allegations, and working with an attorney, your business can come out the other end of this situation intact!
Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!
Download the legal complaint below:
