Sony Trademark Infringement Action | PlayStation Lawsuit

Feb 17, 2025

PlayStation Lawsuit | Sony Trademark Infringement Action

The attorneys at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC have navigated the e-commerce sphere for years. We’ve helped e-commerce sellers get through many tough intellectual property lawsuits and issues. Our team knows exactly how troublesome a trademark infringement lawsuit can be, for example. As such, we prioritize empathy and openness of communication when interacting with our clients. Your business is your baby and it needs protection! However large or small your online selling operation is, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is ready to proceed full steam ahead!

Don’t make the mistake of diminishing the seriousness of the newest Sony Interactive Entertainment trademark lawsuit. This federal action, naming you and other Defendants, is legitimate and must be addressed. Unfortunately, the Sony lawsuit will not resolve itself! You’ll need to respond to the court to avoid a Default Judgment. The Plaintiff is a huge company with loads of resources at their disposal. The Defendants likely don’t have the same type of resources. Which is why it’s important for your business to consider an intellectual property attorney.

The Trademark Lawsuit May Disrupt Your Business

Why has perhaps the worst fear of any e-commerce seller come true? Well, we’re exaggerating a bit. A trademark infringement lawsuit may not be the worst fear. But, it’s certainly a disruption that can cause frustration and cost money. Not to mention time! To sum it up, Sony filed the lawsuit because the brand documented what they perceive to be an overwhelming amount of counterfeit sales. In some instances, a seller is named as a Defendant in IP infringement lawsuits due to no explicit fault of their own. You may have recently sold PlayStation products, maybe not knowing they were unauthorized in terms of branding. Something like that may explain your status as a Defendant. Each seller’s case is unique to them and their business practices! Our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC can help you figure it out.

Because this is a Schedule A infringement lawsuit, the Plaintiff will get a temporary restraining order against the named sellers. The court usually approves these injunctions because the Plaintiff establishes to a reasonable degree that counterfeiting occurred. It’s Sony’s aim to halt the amount of unauthorized sales of the brand’s goods. Due to loss of revenue and damage to their reputation. It’s the allegations themselves that pave the way for the temporary restraining order. And, this will freeze the seller accounts of the Defendants. If you’re looking into directly settling with Sony, know that most Defendants who take this route end up with only 60% of their frozen money! This is reason enough to consider the investment in an attorney worthwhile. Our lawyers at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC will put our superior level of experience in e-commerce to help you!

Why Are Sellers Being Sued by Sony Interactive Entertainment?

What about these allegations of trademark infringement? Where is Sony getting the information from on which they’ve built their belief that counterfeit sales actually happened? The legal complaint tied to the case details the allegations made by the Plaintiff. Defendants should read this document thoroughly, which you can download at the end of this page. Below, we’ll include a selection of Sony’s allegations of IP infringement:

Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the PLAYSTATION Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Genuine PlayStation® Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using the PLAYSTATION Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Genuine PlayStation® Products. 

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple seller aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation despite SIE’s or the SIE Affiliates’ enforcement. E-commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to SIE. 

Defendants’ unauthorized use of the PLAYSTATION Trademarks in connection with the advertising, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products, including the sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States, including Illinois, is likely to cause and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception by and among consumers and is irreparably harming SIE. 

Sony Claims Sellers Acted as a Counterfeit Network

As we’ve seen in the selection excerpted above, the Plaintiff has noted several alleged actions engaged in by the collective Defendants. And, these Defendants are being sued collectively – which is what makes this a Schedule A lawsuit. It’s common in trademark infringement actions that sellers are sued as a group, because brands often claim that sellers have acted as a network of counterfeiters (accurate, true, or not). This PlayStation infringement action is no different! The lawsuit also mentions that the sales allegedly took place on various marketplaces. They include the big ones like Amazon, eBay, and Walmart, and others such as Etsy, Temu, TikTok, DHgate, and Wish.com. 

The Plaintiff, Sony, has filed this trademark infringement action to combat the alleged sale of counterfeit goods by e-commerce operators. The value of the PlayStation trademark(s) is the cause for the lawsuit. Sony wants to guard its brand from losing any further revenue due to unauthorized sales. They also intend to maintain the reputation the brand has established with consumers over the years. The allegations are made up of multiple claims that indicate the sellers acted together to more efficiently sell counterfeit goods. If you’re a Defendant, it’ll benefit you to retain an intellectual property attorney to save you the most in terms of time and money!

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Atari Trademark Infringement Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here