General Motors Files Lawsuit | Trademark Infringement Allegations

Apr 5, 2025

General Motors Sues Online Sellers For Alleged Counterfeit Sales

General Motors has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in federal court after the brand identified an apparent counterfeit network. Are you one of the e-commerce sellers named in the latest GM lawsuit? The brand well-known for its automotive products claims that an overwhelming amount of counterfeit sales have been made online. Per the Plaintiff, this “network” of online sellers have worked in collaboration to successfully offer consumers these unauthorized goods.

The General Motors intellectual property infringement case asserts that the e-commerce sellers are familiar with one another and worked together to sell counterfeit products. A large portion of GM’s allegations of infringement are based on the idea that the Defendants disguise their actual identities. By obfuscating their identities, says the Plaintiff, the named sellers position themselves to evade enforcement. Due to these very serious allegations of counterfeit and subterfuge, it’ll likely be in your best interest to retain one of our attorneys at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC!

See here, this is what’s known as a Schedule A trademark infringement lawsuit. The most practical way to contextualize the meaning of that is with the details of the lawsuit itself. In a word, a “Schedule A” trademark action means that a group of online sellers get sued at the same time, as opposed to individually. Again, General Motors has identified the counterfeit sales within the scope of what they’ve called a “network.” So, all of the Defendants will be equally impacted by the lawsuit. And what’s the manifestation of that impact going to look like? A temporary restraining order!!

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is Passionate About Protecting Your E-Commerce Business

At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we’re passionate about protecting e-commerce businesses! No one at our firm wants to see an online seller’s reputation damaged. Nor would we like to see your online selling business lose a troublesome amount of money because of the trademark action. When you work with our team, we’ll use our world-class experience in the e-commerce legal sphere to get you the resolution you deserve!

Once approved by the court and in effect, the temporary restraining order will freeze all relevant seller accounts. That means YOUR seller accounts will be frozen! This “freeze” applies to the money in those accounts, rendering it inaccessible. GM’s goal with filing the lawsuit in the first place is to stop the sale of counterfeit goods. The injunction is basically the meat-and-potatoes of the Plaintiff’s power play. By freezing sellers’ money and accounts, General Motors positions itself to apply pressure and reach settlements. Their aim is to recoup the losses they’ve taken due to the alleged counterfeiting. It’s for these reasons that affected sellers ought to deeply consider hiring an intellectual property attorney!

Consider Hiring an Attorney Over Reaching a Direct Settlement

Accepting a direct settlement offer from General Motors can be tricky for the impacted online sellers. The average direct settlement comes in at around 60% of the frozen money in a given seller’s online account. That could mean that you’d be handing over about half the amount of money in your account to the Plaintiff, just because of allegations. Rather than accept the allegations and take a substantial hit, you may want to invest in an attorney!

In a sense, investing in Stockman & Poropat, PLLC will save your business money in the long run. You don’t want to get ensnared in any kind of complicated mess that may come with a Default Judgment, for example. You also probably don’t want to have to file for bankruptcy or otherwise shut down your business. If you’re keen on powering through this e-commerce hiccup and getting back to selling, reach out to our team!

The need to respond to the lawsuit is certainly there, because if you don’t respond you may face further complications. The Default Judgment is one of the results you may have to accept if you fail to respond! We strongly urge against ignoring the lawsuit and not responding, as it may cause your business undue hardship. Often enough, Default Judgments are unable to be overturned, as well. When you receive notice of the General Motors lawsuit, definitely respond in a timely manner. And, if you have any questions or concerns related to the response or the lawsuit more broadly, discuss it with us at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC.

General Motors’ Claims of Trademark Infringement

Here are a few excerpts from the GM lawsuit legal complaint: 

In recent years, GM has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering Counterfeit GM Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, Walmart, and Temu, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. The Seller Aliases target consumers in this Judicial District and throughout the United States. 

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. On information and belief, Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the GM Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine GM Products. 

Counterfeit GM Products for sale by the Seller Aliases bear similar irregularities and indicia of being counterfeit to one another, suggesting that the Counterfeit GM Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that Defendants are interrelated. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Hungry for more e-commerce related content? Check out another article about trademark infringement: Online Sellers Sued as “Network” by Rainbow Friends 

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here