Leatherman Trademark Infringement Action

May 9, 2025

Leatherman Sues Online Sellers For Counterfeit Sales

Leatherman has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against online sellers due to alleged counterfeit sales! In order to present a full picture of the details of the lawsuit, we’ll share below a few selections from the legal complaint. It’ll prove useful for affected sellers to read through the complaint with scrutiny. So that you know the allegations and what questions to ask:

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases look sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. 

Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of its LEATHERMAN Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Leatherman Products. 

Defendants are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the LEATHERMAN Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is THE Intellectual Property Law Firm

Rather than jumping the line and leaping to negotiate the issues yourself, consider working with our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC!! The average online seller walks away from direct settlement negotiations at a rate of 60%. That could mean giving away about half of your money to Leatherman. If that doesn’t sound like a great deal, because it’s likely not, then retain your own intellectual property attorney today!

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC cares about online sellers and the difficulties that arise when they get sued for trademark infringement. Our attorneys have delivered ultra-satisfactory outcomes for countless e-commerce operators around the world. We use an empathy- and fact-based approach to address all of your inquiries and concerns. So that you feel confident that our team is handling your case with thoroughness. We don’t want any of our clients to feel unnecessarily frustrated or stressed. Our goal is to put you at ease and develop a great legal strategy!

Needless to say, the Leatherman infringement lawsuit is definitely a serious matter! And due to the seriousness of the allegations, named sellers will need to respond to the court. You really don’t want to see your business get even further damaged by a Default Judgment. And that is a possibility if a response isn’t submitted. Part of what happens in these lawsuits is that sellers’ funds are frozen… A Default Judgment could result in the court awarding ALL of your frozen assets to Leatherman!! If that doesn’t sound like a party, because it’s not, then just be sure to respond. If you require assistance with the response, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC can help you with that, too.

Leatherman Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Online Sellers

As a Schedule A lawsuit, in which a group of sellers are collectively being sued at once, a temporary restraining order is an effective legal tool. Leatherman will have the court approve of the injunction to purposely hinder the Defendants’ ability to further sell their branded products. Point blank, Leatherman wants to stop the sale of what they believe are counterfeit goods. The Plaintiff alleges that the collective action of the group of sellers has cost them revenue and harmed their reputation. Furthermore, the Plaintiff has described the Defendants’ actions as occurring in concert with one another, constituting a “counterfeit network” of sorts.

In the majority of instances, with similar Schedule A infringement cases, the temporary restraining order freezes funds earned from the sale of the Plaintiff’s products. That’ll likely be the case here, as well, but there’s a chance the TRO may also impact other earnings. Overall, the restraining order is a significant disruption to an e-commerce operation! For some, the freeze in funds may push them closer to bankruptcy. All in all, having your own legal team will provide you with the support you need to get through this lawsuit in one piece! At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we want to do all we can to ensure the integrity and long term growth of your online business.

Online Sellers Sued Over Infringement Allegations

Ultimately, the value of the Leatherman marks are what precipitated this lawsuit, in a sense. The Plaintiff’s trademarks hold great value and they’re doing what they can to protect that. Is it necessarily fair that the allegations are wholesale applied to the entire group of Defendants? It may or may not be, depending on the level of responsibility for what the Plaintiff states the sellers engaged in. Regardless, equip yourself with our legal team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC and you’ll have much less to worry about!!

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Check out another intellectual property article: NHL Sues E-Commerce Operators Over Alleged Sale of Counterfeit Goods Online.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here