Mob Entertainment Lawsuit: Infringement Claims Over Sale of Poppy Playtime Products

May 14, 2025

Infringement Claims Over Sale of Poppy Playtime Products: Mob Entertainment Lawsuit

Mob Entertainment, a digital entertainment company, is suing e-commerce operators over the sale of Poppy Playtime products. These goods are unbelievably popular due to the widespread success of the video game that bears the same name. Not only is the Poppy Playtime video game playable on PlayStation, YouTube, Twitch, and more, “playthrough videos” of the game online also draw an audience in the millions. As such, it’s easy to see how the Poppy Playtime trademarks are valuable. 

And, the very value of the Poppy Playtime trademarks is what underscores the reason for the infringement lawsuit. Mob Entertainment, the mark owner, has formed the belief that the actions of the sellers have hurt their business and reputation. Apparently, e-commerce sellers have sold countless Poppy Playtime branded goods to consumers in the United States. The Plaintiff alleges that these products are counterfeit versions of the official products. Mob Entertainment has filed this latest lawsuit to combat this alleged counterfeiting! 

Mob Entertainment Alleges Unauthorized Sales of Goods

To provide affected sellers and readers with more specific information about this infringement lawsuit, we can review portions of the legal complaint. Also, feel free to download the complaint at the bottom of this article. These excerpts should provide some clarification on the infringement allegations: 

The success of the Poppy Playtime video game and brand has resulted in significant counterfeiting of the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademarks and copying of the Poppy Playtime Copyrighted Works. Consequently, Plaintiff regularly investigates suspicious e-commerce stores identified in proactive Internet sweeps and reported by consumers. 

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademarks or copy or distribute the Poppy Playtime Copyrighted Works, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Poppy Playtime Products.

Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademarks and/or copies of the Poppy Playtime Copyrighted Works in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Unauthorized Poppy Playtime Products. 

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC Wants to Save YOU Time and Money!

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is an intellectual property law firm that prides itself on providing a clear line of communication for our clients! Whatever questions or concerns you may have related to the trademark infringement lawsuit, we want to hear them! Our team has an incredible amount of experience in e-commerce and we want you to feel at home with us, which is why we maintain a friendly, welcoming approach. Intellectual property infringement disputes are not the most fun thing in the world. We know the level of frustration and confusion these actions may cause. At the end of the day, our firm wants to save you time and money and do it in the least painful way possible! 

If it hasn’t happened already, Mob Entertainment will notify all of the Defendants that they’re being sued for IP infringement. If you’re one of the named sellers, don’t mistake the notice for something illegitimate – the lawsuit is completely real! Anyone who chooses or otherwise doesn’t submit a response will face the possibility of a Default Judgment! There’s not much that a Defendant can benefit from or even do after that happens and it can cost you even more money and time. Provide a timely response and avoid having to pay steep penalties by simply responding. If you need help with composing and sending the response, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is here for you! 

The Plaintiff’s aim is to stop sellers from offering anymore counterfeit Poppy Playtime goods to consumers. And just how is Mob Entertainment going to accomplish just that? First, the Plaintiff established via the allegations that the Defendants have some level of familiarity with each other. According to the Plaintiff, the sellers have communicated and even commiserated. 

Mob Entertainment Alleges Defendants Comprise a Counterfeit Network

Which is to say, Mob Entertainment wishes to prove that the Defendants form a counterfeit network. This is an often-cited claim in such Schedule A infringement lawsuits filed in Illinois federal court. What’s “Schedule A” mean? Just that the Plaintiff is suing a list of sellers, listed on the lawsuit’s schedule, so to speak. This sort of legal action permits the Plaintiff to sue multiple sellers in one lawsuit versus one seller at a time in multiple lawsuits. It’s a bit of a riddle with some aspects of a tongue-twister! Nevertheless, that’s the situation: Mob Entertainment has identified a network and they’re suing all of them. 

Mob Entertainment is going to rely on a temporary restraining order to halt the Defendants’ sales of unauthorized products! The injunction is going to be effective because it’ll freeze all of the sellers’ online accounts. So if you sold products on Amazon, eBay, Walmart, DHgate, Temu, and more, the earnings generated from Poppy Playtime sales will be frozen. 

Unfortunately, that’s how these lawsuits tend to play out. The Plaintiff asserts several allegations, the Defendants have to respond, and then a temporary restraining order is put into place. All things considered, you can see how having your own legal team will be beneficial! You’ll want to develop a legal strategy that is tailor-made to deliver the outcome you’re seeking. Restraining orders, no matter how temporary, can really impact an e-commerce business’ operation. Our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC will protect your business to the utmost of our ability! 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Curious about what other brands are suing e-commerce operators over infringement allegations? Check out how the Collegiate Licensing Company Sued Online Sellers For Counterfeit Sales in May 2025

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here