Hallmark Sues For Infringement Due to Sale of Counterfeit Jesus and Rainbow Brite Dolls

Sep 14, 2025

Hallmark Jesus and Rainbow Brite Dolls Sold Without Authorization: Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Filed in Federal Court

The firm of Stockman & Poropat, PLLC has earned a stellar reputation in the area of intellectual property law. Our attorneys have received awards recognizing our excellence. And the firm itself has garnered hundreds of positive reviews from satisfied clients who’ve relied on our legal services. We provide actionable legal strategies based on your situation and aims. At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, your goals are our goals! We want to work with you to ensure you get an outcome that aligns as closely as it can with your expectations. 

What about those e-commerce sellers who don’t want to retain an attorney? Perhaps they don’t believe a legal team is required to navigate intellectual property lawsuits. As a law firm, we recognize that any perspective is worth arguing for or against. But, when you’ve been named in a federal infringement action, working with an attorney is the most reasonable approach. And yes, we’re saying that because we’re a law firm! 

However, there’s more to it than just that. See, when major companies sue individual e-commerce operators, they’re threatening the viability of those small businesses. Depending on how much money is involved in the lawsuit, it could shove any given seller to the edge of having to shut down. Stockman & Poropat, PLLC wouldn’t want to see any e-commerce seller have to close up shop unnecessarily. Nor would our firm like to have a seller relinquish a substantial amount of money to the Plaintiff. As that outcome may be avoidable. We will prioritize saving you time and money! We want to protect the integrity of your operation and get you back to selling on the marketplace! 

We’re going to cover how Hallmark is suing sellers due to so-called “unlawful conduct.” Which is related to the sale of counterfeit products. The company alleges that the named Defendants sold a substantial amount of counterfeit versions of their products to consumers online. These products include the My Friend Jesus Stuffed Doll and the Mother Mary Holding Baby Jesus Stuffed Doll. As well as the Rainbow Brite dolls, games, toys, books, and more. The trademark action also identifies the sale of other Hallmark branded goods as having been sold without authorization. And, the Plaintiff insists on imposing consequences in response to these actions. Not because they’re a big bad mean company, but because they experienced revenue loss and documented consumer confusion. Hallmark doesn’t want its reputation to be harmed by what it says are active counterfeiters, knowingly offering counterfeit products online. 

As seen in numerous other, similar infringement actions, Hallmark will request that the court approve a temporary injunction. This will block sellers from their marketplace accounts. This temporary restraining order will prevent the Defendants from accessing money generated from the sale of allegedly counterfeit Hallmark goods. Again, the Plaintiff is explicitly doing so because they believe these actions have resulted in harm for their business.

And, given that the lawsuit is predicated on allegations, the claims specified insofar as infringement goes may or may not be applicable to any and/or all of the Defendants. Which is why having the right, competent – and in our case at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC – exemplary legal team to back you up! Don’t take a loss if you don’t have to. Equip yourself with the right tool and the right team. That way, you can achieve the resolution you need to continue on your path as a successful e-commerce seller. 

Submit a Timely Response and Avoid a Default Judgment!

Be sure to respond to the lawsuit! The terms, at this time, may not appear to be favorable. But, failure to respond could make them even less favorable. There’s no sense risking a Default Judgment and additional costs and/or fees. Submit a timely response, retain an attorney, and start walking down the road to resolution! 

At this juncture, we’re going to acknowledge Hallmark’s allegations of infringement, precisely how they’re described, by including excerpts from the legal complaint. We suggest that any affected seller carefully review the complaint so that they’re informed and can share any questions or concerns during an initial consult with Stockman & Poropat, PLLC:

Defendants are collectively causing harm to Plaintiff’s goodwill and reputation because the effect of their unlawful actions taken together amplifies each harm and creates a single negative consumer impression. Defendants’ activities, occurring at the same time and in the same retail space and manner as one another, blend together to create a single negative impression on consumers such that they constitute the same occurrence or series of occurrences. 

The combination of all Defendants engaging in the same illegal activity in the same time span causes a collective harm to Plaintiff in a way that individual actions, occurring alone, might not. 

E-commerce store operators like Defendants regularly register or acquire new seller aliases for the purpose of offering for sale and selling Unauthorized Products. Such seller alias registration patterns are one of many common tactics used by E-commerce store operators like Defendants to conceal their identities, the full scope and interworking of their counterfeiting operation, and to avoid being shut down. 

Hallmark Identified “Counterfeit Network,” Sued For Trademark Infringement

As seen above, Hallmark wants to determine that the Defendants are interrelated, share common counterfeit goals, and work together to more effectively sell infringing products. Do you know any of the Defendants listed on the lawsuit’s Schedule A? Have you actually used the communication platforms specified in the complaint to share best tactics for how to stealthily evade enforcement and trick consumers into buying rip-off Hallmark products? Whatever the case may be, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is confident we can work out a legal solution that benefits your business! 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today! 

Download the legal complaint below: 

Up next you can read about how the Volkswagen Group of America Sued Multiple E-Commerce Operators For Selling Unauthorized Audi Goods.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here