Sold Audi Products Online? Volkswagen Group of America Sues E-Commerce Sellers For Infringement

Sep 16, 2025

Volkswagen Group of America Sues E-Commerce Sellers For Infringement Over Sale of Audi Products Online

Volkswagen Group of America has filed a federal lawsuit to combat the sale of counterfeit Audi products. VW is moving on this trademark infringement action for several reasons, all of which are based on allegations of unlawful activity. The unlawful nature of the activity refers to actions the Defendants took to successfully sell counterfeit products to unknowing consumers, according to VW. Have ALL of the named sellers in this lawsuit actually engaged in what the Plaintiff says they did? That all really depends on your particular situation! Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is here to help you figure out what your e-commerce business is actually responsible for.

We want to let affected sellers know that the Audi trademark infringement action focuses on a major allegation. What’re we talking about? The Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendants form a collective “counterfeit network.” This network allegedly exists with the express purpose of facilitating the sale of infringing, unauthorized Audi products. Which is to say, the named sellers in the lawsuit have collaborated, communicated, and organized their approach to most effectively sell counterfeit Audi goods to consumers online. By identifying the Defendants as a network, VW has positioned themselves to sue multiple sellers in a single lawsuit. Versus suing each seller individually. It’s an advantage for the Plaintiff, because they’re attempting to recoup damages. To protect your business, reach out to us at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC!

Provide a Response to the Court, Avoid a Default Judgment

Please, provide a response to the court in a reasonable time frame to avoid a Default Judgment. We urge the Defendants to consider this matter very serious and to act accordingly. The Audi trademark infringement case isn’t a sham or a ruse – it’s a real lawsuit filed in federal court. The consequences of not submitting a timely response could be financially severe, in other words. It’s unlikely that any Defendant in this case would want to face a Default Judgment. You can fairly simply keep clear of that possibility by just responding!

Let’s take a peek at the allegations in the Audi infringement lawsuit, as written in the legal complaint. Any Defendant in this case should review the legal complaint with thoroughness, in order to inform themselves of the allegations. Knowing what VW is alleging is also useful for when you do have an initial consultation with our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC…

Allegations of Infringement Due to Sale of Audi Branded Goods Online

Defendants facilitate sales by designing e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases appear sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal. 

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the Audi Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Audi Products. 

Defendants’ activities, occurring at the same time and in the same retail space and manner as one another, blend together to create a single negative impression on consumers such that they constitute the same occurrence or series of occurrences. The combination of all Defendants engaging in the same illegal activity in the same time span causes a collective harm to Plaintiff in a way that individual actions, occurring alone, might not. 

What E-Commerce Sellers Being Sued by VW Should Expect

Here’s what to expect. VW is going to have the court approve a temporary restraining order, which will freeze all marketplaces accounts belonging to the Defendants. As you may have guessed, this means that affected sellers won’t be able to access the funds in those accounts. Mainly, the injunction is targeting the sale of Audi products. That is, the restraining order functions to inhibit Defendants’ access to their money so as to prevent the further sale of counterfeit Audi goods. In some instances, the injunction can impact money not even earned from the sale of the Plaintiff’s products. So, all in all, the lawsuit can result in an undeniable disruption to your e-commerce operations. The most sensible action to take is aligning yourself with the appropriate legal team – Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is here for you!

Now, why is VW suing e-commerce sellers for allegedly selling counterfeit products? Essentially, because that’s what the Plaintiff believes happened. And, as noted earlier, the Plaintiff states that the actions of the Defendants resulted in a significant loss of revenue. What VW doesn’t want is for online consumers to believe they’re purchasing an authorized Audi branded product, when they’re not. That’s another aspect of the lawsuit. The Plaintiff says that the Defendants’ actions have caused consumers to purchase such counterfeit goods unknowingly. Which, per VW, means their reputation has been damaged, as well.

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is looking forward to working with you! Our firm is headed by two incredible intellectual property attorneys who legitimately care about our clients. We approach our client-attorney relationship with compassion, patience, and diligence. Our team possesses an uncommon amount of experience in the e-commerce legal universe and we know how to develop creative legal solutions that work!

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today! 

Download the legal complaint below: 

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here