Owner of Atomic Heart Trademark Suing Online Sellers

Jun 24, 2024

Online Sellers Sued by Owner of Atomic Heart Trademark

Have you ever heard of the video game Atomic Heart? This first-person shooter video game, released at the beginning of 2023, has gained popularity around the world. The game’s owner is Slimao Ltd., an entertainment company and video game studio based in Cyprus. The game has seen wild success on PlayStation, Xbox, Twitch, and other consoles. As such, the demand for Atomic Heart branded products has risen. What comes with that popularity is counterfeiting! That’s why Slimao Ltd. has filed a federal lawsuit against online sellers for trademark infringement. 

According to the Plaintiff, they’ve acquired robust common law trademark rights over many years. In addition, Slimao Ltd. also registered a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The Plaintiff is suing online sellers because they claim the Defendants sold counterfeit Atomic Heart goods in the US. 

Slimao Ltd. Lawsuit Aimed at Counterfeiters

As a Defendant named in the lawsuit, you’ll soon be facing a temporary restraining order (TRO). Slimao Ltd. is going to more than likely request the court approve the TRO . That’s so they can stifle what they believe is rampant trademark infringement. The Plaintiff’s intent is to get back a portion of the money they’ve lost as a result of the counterfeiting.

Now, to the affected online sellers who are wondering “What should I do?” This… Hire an intellectual property attorney! Down the road you may want to reach a settlement or negotiate with Slimao Ltd. Your lawyer will be able to handle negotiations and settlements for you. You won’t have to worry about it. If a seller wishes to address the accuracy of the allegations made against them and their business, an attorney can definitely work with you to accomplish that, too. An intellectual property attorney is essential for online sellers dealing with infringement lawsuits! 

Atomic Heart Trademark Infringement Claims

What are the claims that Slimao Ltd. made regarding the Defendants? Here’s a selection of the counterfeit/infringement allegations:

E-commerce store operators like Defendants commonly engage in fraudulent conduct when registering the Seller Aliases by providing false, misleading, and/or incomplete information to e-commerce platforms to prevent discovery of their true identities and the scope of their e-commerce operation.

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases include other notable common features, such as use of the same registration patterns, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, keywords, advertising tactics, similarities in price and quantities, the same incorrect grammar and misspellings, and/or the use of the same text and images. Additionally, Counterfeit Products for sale by the Seller Aliases bear similar irregularities and indicia of being counterfeit to one another, suggesting that the Counterfeit Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that Defendants are interrelated.

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple seller aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation in spite of Plaintiff’s enforcement. E- commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to Plaintiff.

Defendants are working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have jointly and severally, knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the ATOMIC HEART Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet

The Defendants Are Getting Sued as a Group | Schedule A Lawsuit

Essentially, Slimao Ltd. is saying that a group of online sellers, aka the Defendants, are acting as a network to sell fake Atomic Heart products on the marketplace. The Plaintiff is making this claim via a particular type of lawsuit, known as Schedule A. In a Schedule A suit, brands like Slimao Ltd. can file claims of infringement against many sellers, rather than just one at a time. The strategy behind the Plaintiff’s decision is to reap the largest amount by way of settlements. If the Plaintiff can settle directly with the sellers, that’ll increase the amount they get back from what they claim are damages. 

Understandably, sellers may want to settle with Slimao Ltd. and move on with their lives. The likelihood of getting a settlement that’s favorable by this method, without an attorney, is slim. On average, direct settlements in Schedule A infringement cases land at around just 60%. And, if you’re asking “60% of what?” The answer to that is your money. See, when a restraining order is approved by the court in a case like this, the Defendants’ online seller accounts will be frozen. All of the money earned from selling Atomic Hearts products – you won’t be able to touch it. To alleviate the strain of the TRO with the least amount of friction and the most beneficial outcome, rely on your intellectual property attorney! 

Don’t Worry, Hire an Intellectual Property Attorney!

While you may be nervous because Slimao Ltd. is suing you for trademark infringement, you do have the power to address the lawsuit in a productive manner. There’s no need to be scared by the lawsuit! Even if you’re not well-versed in the US legal system, that’s totally ok! Rely on your attorney to guide you through the legal process and reach a resolution that makes sense for your online selling business. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC for a free consultation today! The attorneys at our firm have deep experience in developing creative legal solutions for online sellers just like you.  

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Collegiate Licensing Company Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here