Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger Trademark Infringement Action

Feb 15, 2025

Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger Trademark Infringement Action 2025

Plaintiffs Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger are suing e-commerce sellers in federal court! These major retailers are going forward with this lawsuit because of trademark infringement. The Plaintiffs alleged that a group of online sellers acted as a network to streamline counterfeit sales. What’s more, the latest Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger infringement action is a Schedule A lawsuit. In essence, the “network” of sellers who’ve sold unauthorized products are being sued as a whole. The allegations apply to one and all, though each seller’s outcome and/resolution may be specific to each Defendant. 

Where did the trademark infringement on Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger goods occur? On online seller platforms the likes of Amazon, eBay, TikTok, Etsy, Walmart, Temu, DHgate, Wish.com, and more. The Plaintiffs’ allegations are to be taken quite seriously because they will have an effect on the Defendants’ e-commerce business. The most unavoidably disruptive part of this lawsuit will likely be the temporary restraining order that comes with it. Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger will have the court issue a restraining order to block sellers from further infringing sales. Stockman & Poropat, PLLC can help you address this lawsuit, negotiate with the Plaintiffs, and obtain a resolution that ultimately saves you time and money!

What Are the Trademark Infringement Allegations?

The following selections of text represent a cross-section of the trademark allegations filed by the Plaintiffs. We are sharing these excerpts to give readers some context for this legal scenario. If you’re one of the Defendants, be sure to absorb all of the information in the legal complaint, which you can download at the end of this article: 

Plaintiffs have identified numerous fully interactive e- commerce stores offering Counterfeit Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, TikTok, and Temu, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. 

The injuries and damages sustained by Plaintiffs have been directly and approximately caused by Defendants’ wrongful reproduction, use, advertisement, promotion, offering to sell, and sale of Counterfeit Products. 

Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using Plaintiffs’ Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Plaintiffs’ Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under Seller Aliases omit using Plaintiffs’ Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Plaintiffs’ Products. 

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple seller aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation in spite of Plaintiffs’ enforcement. E- commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to Plaintiffs. 

Our Attorneys Can Help Save Your E-Commerce Business

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is a law firm spearheaded by incredible attorneys who possess an incredible amount of experience in e-commerce. Our team is genuinely excited to work with you to figure out the most sensible solution for your business! The cost of retaining an intellectual property attorney is worthwhile because you’ll be able to more effectively protect your business. Sellers in Schedule A lawsuits who try to directly settle with Plaintiffs can end up losing a substantial percentage of their funds. 

Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger will have the court approve of a temporary restraining order, as we mentioned. The injunction’s impact will be seen by way of a freeze on the Defendants’ online seller accounts. This restraining order will prevent sellers from accessing any and all money in those accounts! For this reason, our team wants to emphasize that the decision to work with a lawyer or not should be weighed carefully. Direct settlements with Plaintiffs often result in sellers getting to walk away with around 60% of their frozen money. At the very least, consult with our firm to get an idea of the options available to you! We don’t want to see any seller impacted by the lawsuit unnecessarily lose money. 

Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger Sues Sellers For Counterfeiting

Basically, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger’s lawsuit against sellers for trademark infringement is meant to stop unauthorized sales of their products. The mere fact that you sold goods branded with these names could explain why you’ve been named in the lawsuit. Each of the Defendant’s particular involvement in the alleged activity varies. That’s why you’ll benefit from having our lawyers at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC tailor-make you a legal strategy. Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger are attempting to protect their business in a legal context and you can do the exact same thing! Having an IP attorney on your side will provide you, as a seller, with the resources your business requires to continue operating despite the lawsuit. 

Please, take this lawsuit seriously! This is a federal trademark infringement action filed by two major brands. Any Defendant in the case must provide a response to the court to avoid a Default Judgment. Dealing with a Default Judgment is typically more costly for Defendants than a restraining order. Respond to the lawsuit, consult with an attorney, develop a strategy, and move forward and onward to further success! 

At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we know how uniquely frustrating a Schedule A lawsuit alleging infringement can be. Our team integrates an empathetic and friendly approach into our work, too. Whatever the scale of your e-commerce operation, you deserve to protect your hard-earned money! That’s why we’re here. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Sony Trademark Infringement Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Patagonia Pattie Gonia Trademark Lawsuit: Why the Dispute Matters

Patagonia Pattie Gonia Trademark Lawsuit: A Closer Look at the Dispute The Patagonia Pattie Gonia trademark lawsuit has sparked strong reactions online. Many people view the dispute as a conflict between a major company and an environmental advocate. Others see it as...

Mechanics Liens in New York: What Contractors Should Know

Mechanics Liens in New York: What Contractors and Property Owners Should Know Mechanics' liens in New York can give contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and laborers a powerful legal tool when a property owner or contractor fails to pay for completed work. However,...

Dude Perfect TRO Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Dude Perfect TRO Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Dude Perfect TRO lawsuit was filed on May 26, 2026, in Case No. 26-cv-06135. Filed in the Northern District of Illinois, the lawsuit joins a growing number of trademark enforcement actions aimed at online...

When Does a Small Business Need Legal Help?

When Does a Small Business Need Legal Help? Small business legal help often becomes important long before a lawsuit or major dispute appears. Many entrepreneurs wait until something goes wrong before speaking with an attorney. A contract issue arises, a partner...

Deckers TRO Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Deckers TRO Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Deckers TRO lawsuit was filed on May 20, 2026, in Case No. 26-cv-05877. The case adds another major consumer brand to the growing list of companies targeting online sellers through trademark litigation. Filed in the...

Business Law Commercial Law: Key Differences for Business Owners

Business Law v. Commercial Law: Key Differences for Business Owners If you own a company or plan to start one, understanding business law vs commercial law can help you make smarter legal decisions. While many people use these terms interchangeably, business law and...

Casetify TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Casetify TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Casetify TRO lawsuit targets online sellers accused of selling counterfeit phone cases and electronic accessories that allegedly infringe the company’s intellectual property. On May 12, 2026, Casetagram Limited, the...

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here