Liverpool Football Club Counterfeit Lawsuit

Sep 26, 2024

Federal Schedule A Lawsuit | Liverpool Football Club Sues Sellers

We’re here to tell you that the Liverpool Football Club (LFC) has filed a trademark lawsuit in federal court! Specifically, online sellers have been accused of offering counterfeit goods to consumers in the United States. What’s more, the Plaintiff alleges that the sellers, listed on the lawsuit’s Schedule A, have worked together to accomplish this infringement. Is that necessarily true just because it’s what Liverpool Football Club claims? Perhaps not, depending on the individual seller’s actions. What are the named sellers supposed to do now that they’re being sued? 

Before anything, sellers ought to try and absorb the gravity and reality of this legal situation. This is a federal infringement lawsuit filed by a major brand against e-commerce operators. Who the David is and who the Goliath is may be fairly clear. Considering all of that, as a named seller, take time to read the legal complaint in order to understand the allegations of trademark infringement.

Online Sellers Sued by Liverpool Football Club

Here follows several excerpts of Liverpool Football Club’s claims of counterfeit: 

By using the LFC Trademarks in connection with the sale of Counterfeit Products, Defendants create a false designation of origin and a misleading representation of fact as to the origin and sponsorship of the Counterfeit Products.

Defendants’ false designation of origin and misrepresentation of fact as to the origin and/or sponsorship of the Counterfeit Products to the general public involves the use of counterfeit marks and is a willful violation of Section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. 

Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of the LFC Trademarks. Plaintiff’s United States Registrations for the LFC Trademarks [] are in full force and effect. On information and belief, Defendants have knowledge of Plaintiff’s rights in the LFC Trademarks and are willfully infringing and intentionally using counterfeits of the LFC Trademarks. Defendants’ willful, intentional, and unauthorized use of the LFC Trademarks is likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake, and deception as to the origin and quality of the Counterfeit Products among the general public. 

Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have jointly and severally, knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the LFC Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

What Happens Now That You’re Being Sued?

It may come as no surprise that some sellers might be afraid of what may happen now that LFC is suing them. Are you going to lose all the money you earned from selling Liverpool Football Club products? If you don’t take the appropriate level of action, will there be even more legal trouble? But even if you’re an online seller in China or anywhere outside the US, there’s little reason to be fearful. Intellectual property attorneys exist to step in at this very moment! If you work with our team, we can strategize and negotiate for you so that you don’t lose your money. And, we’ll employ our experiential knowledge of this particular area of law to develop a tailor-made resolution for your business. 

Don’t ignore the Liverpool Football Club trademark lawsuit! That’s the type of move that could land you and your business in an even trickier spot. What we mean by that is it could result in the court issuing a Default Judgment against you. When that takes place, the decision is often tough to overturn and can be an expensive ordeal to address. In Schedule A infringement lawsuits, the Defendants should respond to the court. If you aren’t knowledgeable on how to write and/or submit that response, that’s ok! Our team of attorneys can absolutely work with you on that response. 

The Question of Settlements, Negotiations, and Resolutions

Another inquiry or concern that arises with federal counterfeit lawsuits is settlements. Sellers are in a position to try and negotiate directly with the Plaintiff, if they want. Now, while that sort of choice could prove expeditious, it might not allow sellers to keep the most amount of their money. See, when Liverpool Football Club filed the lawsuit, they intended to get a temporary restraining order approved. That restraining order, once approved and in effect, will freeze sellers’ online accounts. And the money in those accounts? You won’t have access to it. Therefore, when LFC is in negotiations with sellers directly, settlements are usually for around 60% of the money in your frozen account. That’s why you may want to work with our attorneys, because we want you to keep more than half of your hard-earned money! 

When Liverpool Football Club gets the restraining order approved, you’ll have to respond to have that lifted from your account. To ignore the lawsuit is to risk having all of the money in your frozen account awarded to the Plaintiff. And sure, the LFC claims of trademark infringement are simply that: claims. Nothing has been proven, none of the sellers are inherently guilty. The allegations are impactful on their own, though. This isn’t the sort of legal scenario that will resolve itself. And, if you’re a Defendant and you’re worried about getting a fair outcome, you’ll do best to achieve that with the guidance of an intellectual property attorney. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Crye Precision Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here