Lululemon Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Sep 12, 2024

Lululemon Alleges Sellers Infringed on Trademarks

Well, yet again a major brand has filed a trademark lawsuit aimed at online sellers. Why was this new Lululemon Schedule A infringement lawsuit filed? To stop what the Plaintiff believes is abundant sales of counterfeit products. The so-described illicit, infringing activity occurred on platforms such as Amazon, eBay, Etsy, Wish.com, Walmart, Temu, and similar platforms. Are you one of the sellers being sued by Lululemon? Did you know that you’re entitled to get your own legal representation?!

Are you a seller named as a Defendant in this trademark infringement lawsuit? You can and even should retain your own intellectual property attorney. You might be based in China or the United States or an entirely different country. No matter where you operate as an e-commerce seller. You should hire your own IP lawyer to work with you to deal with the Lululemon lawsuit. The suit presents a significant roadblock to your normal operation – the temporary restraining order. Once the Plaintiff gets approval from the court, the restraining order will go into effect. Then, the money in your seller account or accounts will be frozen. Should you be toying with the idea of doing nothing in response, or abandoning the issue, guess what? You’ll give all of that money you earned to the Plaintiff!

How Sellers Should React to the Trademark Lawsuit

As a seller, being sued by a company like Lululemon can be a big blow to your online selling business. E-commerce operators don’t always have an abundance of funds and when an infringement lawsuit happens it can make many businesses vulnerable. To be sure, even though the lawsuit consists of allegations of counterfeit, the restraining order has an actual impact on daily business operations. We believe online sellers like you have a right to a reasonable and fair outcome. To that end, we’ll do everything we can to move your business into the future by responding and negotiating for you.

As we noted, the Lululemon infringement case is built on several allegations of counterfeiting. And precisely what is the Plaintiff alleging the named sellers did? Among the claims put forth, sellers have been accused of acting as a network of counterfeiters. As a said counterfeiting network, the Defendants allegedly engage in multiple common tactics to increase their chances of getting away with deliberate infringement.

Lululemon Allegations of Intellectual Property Infringement

Below, let’s take a look at a selection of the claims as they’re written in the legal complaint:

Lululemon has identified numerous fully interactive, e-commerce stores, including those operating under the Seller Aliases, which were offering for sale and/or selling Counterfeit Lululemon Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Walmart, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, TikTok, and Temu, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. 

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the LULULEMON Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Lululemon products.

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple seller aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation in spite of Lululemon’s enforcement. E-commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to Lululemon. 

Are you unsure where you should start in terms of handling the lawsuit? Begin with reading the legal complaint in full. Try to understand the allegations to the best of your ability. Once you’ve gathered the information, you can then better comprehend the gravity of the situation. Also, when you have your initial consultation with an attorney, such as a member of our team, any questions you may have can be answered! We want you to make the best decisions possible for your online selling business. Better to be informed than not when it comes to infringement lawsuits!

As a Federal Lawsuit, Of Course It’s Serious!

Now, for any seller who wants to ignore the lawsuit, we must urge you not to! A response is needed. Without a response, like we said the frozen money in your seller account will be ultimately rewarded to the Plaintiff. What’s more, the choice to not submit a response could result in a Default Judgment, costing you additional money. The value and longevity of your e-commerce business can be affected by this lawsuit, so take it seriously!

With the temporary restraining order approved, Lululemon will be applying some pressure on the sellers they’re suing. Some may want to settle directly with the Plaintiff. The benefit there would be that it may be quick. The downside of a direct settlement, not negotiated by an attorney on your behalf, is that you could lose a large chunk of your money! In most instances, when a Plaintiff in an infringement lawsuit settles with a seller, they’ll give the seller just about 60% of their money. That’s more than half of the money you earned! If you’re not interested in that sort of outcome, reach out to our team today!

What should sellers do to negotiate the greatest available settlement? Hire an intellectual property attorney! Our lawyers at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC have worked with countless online sellers dealing with Schedule A infringement lawsuits. Our laser-focused experience in this area of the law and e-commerce has helped numerous sellers all over the world.

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Vogue Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here