Nat King Cole Trademark Lawsuit | Claims of Counterfeit Filed by Iconic NKC IP LLC

Jun 6, 2024

Online Sellers Sued in Nat King Cole Trademark Lawsuit

Iconic NKC IP LLC has filed a lawsuit against online sellers! They own the famous musician Nat King Cole trademark. The Plaintiff contends that multiple online sellers have sold trademark infringing Nat King Cole products to consumers in the United States. Specifically, the Nat King Cole trademark lawsuit states:

Defendants facilitate sales by designing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases appear sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal. 

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use the NAT KING COLE Trademark, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Nat King Cole products. 

Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the NAT KING COLE Trademark without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e- commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for e-commerce stores relevant to consumer searches for Nat King Cole products. 

Other e-commerce stores operating under Seller Aliases omit using the NAT KING COLE Trademark in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Nat King Cole products.

How Online Sellers Will Be Affected by the Counterfeit Allegations

The counterfeit Nat King Cole goods were sold on various online marketplaces. Such as Amazon, Temu, eBay, Etsy, Wish.com, Alibaba, AliExpress, Walmart, and DHgate. If any Defendant is wondering what to do, first of all you need to respond to the lawsuit! How do you ensure your response is appropriate? You may want to hire an intellectual property attorney. 

Definitely don’t just ignore the notice of the lawsuit and pretend it’s not real. To avoid the actuality of the lawsuit will likely create a larger problem for your business. It could mean the forfeiture of all the money in your account(s). Or, it could fast track you to a Default Judgment, which is very difficult to overturn. 

The accuracy of the allegations made by the Plaintiff against the sellers may vary. The claims of counterfeit are legitimate. The extent to which they apply to every single named seller is to be determined. The reason the lawsuit was filed is because the owner of the Nat King Cole trademark believes counterfeiting took place. So much so that the value of their intellectual property was damaged. Of course, the Plaintiff is entitled to file these claims and seek compensation for the alleged damages. In the same way, sellers who are affected by the lawsuit are permitted to obtain their own legal counsel to respond. And you should! Your attorney can work with you to break down the exact meaning and implication of the counterfeit allegations. They can respond for you and then negotiate with the Plaintiff if necessary. 

Settlements and Schedule A Infringement Lawsuits…

This particular lawsuit is a Schedule A infringement case. In recent years, there’s been an increase in these sorts of lawsuits against online sellers. It allows Plaintiffs to sue a group of online sellers at the same time, claiming infringement across the board. A big part of Schedule A lawsuits is settlements. The Plaintiff uses the nature of the lawsuit, being filed against many sellers, to negotiate settlements. They do so with as many Defendants as they possibly can. This expedites the legal process. And, the timeline for regaining their alleged losses. It also allows the Plaintiff to maintain an overall edge. 

Frustratingly, settlements in Schedule A lawsuits don’t usually work out in the Defendants’ favor! Some sellers may want to just accept a settlement and move on as quickly as they can. That’s understandable! But, you could be unnecessarily losing lots and lots of your money. Rather than just giving the money you’ve earned by selling goods online to the Plaintiff because of allegations, you can rely on an attorney to negotiate a favorable settlement for you. 

How to Address the Temporary Restraining Order

The biggest disruption that accompanies trademark infringement lawsuits is the temporary restraining order (TRO). Once the court approves the TRO, the Defendants’ selling accounts will be frozen. What that means is sellers won’t have access to the funds in their seller accounts. This could be very serious for many online sellers and even place them in the crosshairs of bankruptcy. As a seller, you need every dollar you earned to stay in business. The best way to negotiate with the Plaintiff to lift the restraining order? Get yourself an intellectual property attorney! 

Sure enough, hiring an attorney will cost you money. The cost of an attorney pales in comparison to the cost of not hiring one and then later facing even more hurdles with this lawsuit! In essence, if you want to save as much of your money as you can and get back to your regular e-commerce operation, a lawyer is your best option. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation! We look forward to helping you with the infringement lawsuit affecting your business.

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest NBA Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here