Pit Viper Sues Online Sellers for Infringement

Jun 18, 2024

Online Sellers Sued by Pit Viper for Infringement

Pit Viper, the very popular sunglass, eyewear, and apparel brand, has filed a lawsuit to combat trademark infringement. This is at least the second such lawsuit the Plaintiff has filed this year. Back in January, the company also sued online sellers for counterfeit, which you can read about here. This case has very similar components, with regard to the allegations of trademark infringement. Let’s talk about what the newest Pit Viper trademark infringement case means for the affected online sellers. 

You’re not going to want to wait to take action once you’ve received notice of the lawsuit! The impact of the Pit Viper suit on your account could cost you crucial financial resources. What’s the most effective way to reduce the negative effect on your business? Retain an attorney today! You’ll absolutely benefit from having an experienced lawyer who can offer the necessary guidance to navigate the lawsuit with relative ease. If any of the allegations made against you and your business aren’t accurate or true, your attorney can also help with clearing that up. Finally, if you should be interested to settle with the Plaintiff, your attorney’s negotiating powers will be invaluable! 

Pit Viper Schedule A Counterfeit Lawsuit

To provide further clarity, let’s address what this lawsuit is and how it works. As a “Schedule A” lawsuit, Pit Viper gives themselves the ability to sue many sellers at the same time. By alleging that a whole group of counterfeiters have infringed on their intellectual property, the Plaintiff has the advantage. They claim that the sellers sold counterfeit goods to customers in the US, true or not, and then put pressure on those sellers to settle. What you may not know, however, is that settlements in these infringement cases (Schedule A) more often than not leaves sellers in the lurch. Settlements reached directly with Plaintiffs on average leave sellers with just over half their frozen money. 

What do we mean by frozen money? The brands who file these lawsuits usually get the court to approve what’s called a temporary restraining order (TRO). Once the restraining order is in play, the seller accounts of all of the accused Defendants will be frozen. You won’t be able to access your accounts or the money in them! Ostensibly, Pit Viper wants to put a hold on the so-described rampant infringement that has been ongoing. Is the Plaintiff concerned about how the sellers will continue doing business after the TRO is implemented? No, of course not! It’s up to each business to figure out how they’ll remedy this situation. For these reasons, you’ll want to retain an intellectual property attorney. 

Respond to the Pit Viper Infringement Lawsuit!

How do you proceed after you’ve been notified of the Pit Viper infringement suit? Respond to the lawsuit itself! That’s so important. The lawsuit will not just go away on its own. It’s definitely a real legal issue and you must respond. If any of the sellers accused of counterfeiting ignore the lawsuit, they may then face a Default Judgment. That’s an outcome you don’t want to learn about! It’s really tough to overturn and it will cost your business more money than you’ve already lost due to the restraining order. 

Pit Viper is suing online sellers because the company believes that the alleged counterfeiting that took place has damaged their brand. They have robust means and are going to try and recoup as much of their losses as possible. While the Defendants’ businesses may be suffering from the restraining order, the time to act is now! Better to invest in an attorney today and respond to the lawsuit right the first time, than try it yourself, do it wrong, and then have to pay for an attorney later. 

Allegations of Infringement | What Pit Viper Claims…

Here, we’ll take a closer look at the allegations detailed in the legal complaint tied to the lawsuit:

Defendants have sold, offered to sell, marketed, distributed, and advertised, and are still selling, offering to sell, marketing, distributing, and advertising products using counterfeit reproductions of the PIT VIPER Trademarks without Pit Viper’s permission

Pit Viper is the exclusive owner of the PIT VIPER Trademarks. Pit Viper’s United States Registrations for the PIT VIPER Trademarks (Exhibit 1) are in full force and effect. On information and belief, Defendants have knowledge of Pit Viper’s rights in the PIT VIPER Trademarks and are willfully infringing and intentionally using counterfeits of the PIT VIPER Trademarks. Defendants’ willful, intentional, and unauthorized use of the PIT VIPER Trademarks is likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake, and deception as to the origin and quality of the Counterfeit Pit Viper Products among the general public.

Defendants are working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Pit Viper Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Pit Viper, have jointly and severally, knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the PIT VIPER Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Pit Viper Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants are in constant communication with each other and regularly participate in QQ.com chat rooms and through websites such as sellerdefense.cn and kuajingvs.com regarding tactics for operating multiple accounts, evading detection, pending litigation, and potential new lawsuits

We know dealing with a trademark infringement lawsuit is stressful. It can definitely be a drain on you and your business. What if you have the proper legal counsel? The process of responding, negotiating, and unfreezing your account can be much less stressful! 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Harley-Davidson Trademark Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here