Poppy Playtime Infringement Lawsuit

Jul 24, 2024

Online Sellers Sued For Trademark and Copyright Infringement | Poppy Playtime Lawsuit

Greetings online sellers, we’re here to tell you about a new infringement lawsuit! The case was filed by Mob Entertainment, Inc., who owns the intellectual property of Poppy Playtime, a popular video game. According to the Plaintiff, multiple online sellers, being sued all at once under this Schedule A lawsuit, sold counterfeit Poppy Playtime products. These allegations are extremely serious and should be treated as such! 

The sellers named as Defendants shouldn’t ignore the lawsuit! It’s a top priority that you respond to the court. If you are one of the sellers who is getting sued, respond! Any failure to properly respond could lead to a Default Judgment, which is very expensive! If you can, try to avoid getting tangled up with a Default Judgment. Make sure you respond to the lawsuit! If you don’t know how to do that, consult with an intellectual property attorney. 

Mob Entertainment Suing Online Sellers

The Poppy Playtime trademark and copyright infringement lawsuit was filed by Mob Entertainment, Inc. against online sellers. The Plaintiff is suing the Defendants as part of a Schedule A case. That’s so they can reach direct settlements with the sellers. By and large, when brands like Mob Entertainment and other consumer-good-giants file these lawsuits, they want to get back some of the money they’ve lost. Settlements are one effective way to achieve that. Because on the whole Schedule A direct settlements hover at around 60% of the seller’s frozen money. 

Frozen money? That’s correct. When Schedule A infringement lawsuits are filed, Plaintiffs frequently request and get approval for a temporary restraining order (TRO). When that’s in action, sellers are unable to collect any money from their online seller accounts. Because they’ve been restrained! The seller accounts are frozen so that the Defendants can’t engage in further sales of counterfeit goods. When a seller is suffering from a TRO, they’re more likely to consider a direct settlement with the Plaintiff. Even in cases where that type of decision will lead to a seller taking a financial loss. The reason for this is that it’s a fast track to getting the lawsuit over and done with. But, as we noted, direct settlements can result in sellers unnecessarily losing money. 

Want to negotiate a settlement with Mob Entertainment, Inc. that doesn’t lead to you having to let go of more than half your money? Hire an intellectual property attorney! 

Online Sellers Should Hire an Attorney

When you’ve retained a lawyer you can have them respond to the lawsuit for you. If need be, they can forward key information to the Plaintiff that establishes your actual identity. In some cases, that’s enough to have the allegations against your business amended. Whatever method of resolution you want to aim for, having an intellectual property attorney will vastly improve your chances at achieving it. 

Allegations of Infringement on Poppy Playtime Marks

What are some of the allegations Mob Entertainment, Inc. is making against online sellers? Check out a selection of the infringement claims: 

Many Defendants also deceive unknowing consumers by using the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademark without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e- commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Poppy Playtime Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under Seller Aliases omit using the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademark in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Poppy Playtime Products.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants commonly engage in fraudulent conduct when registering the Seller Aliases by providing false, misleading, and/or incomplete information to e-commerce platforms to prevent discovery of their true identities and the scope of their e-commerce operation.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants are in constant communication with each other and regularly participate in QQ.com chat rooms and through websites such as sellerdefense.cn and kuajingvs.com regarding tactics for operating multiple accounts, evading detection, pending litigation, and potential new lawsuits.

Defendants’ unauthorized use of the POPPY PLAYTIME Trademark and/or copies of the Poppy Playtime Copyrighted Works in connection with the advertising, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Unauthorized Poppy Playtime Products, including the sale of Unauthorized Poppy Playtime Products into the United States, including Illinois, is likely to cause and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception by and among consumers and is irreparably harming Plaintiff

How to Navigate a Federal Infringement Lawsuit

As an online seller, getting sued for trademark and copyright infringement can be a nuisance. That may even be somewhat of an understatement! There are ways in which the lawsuit might scare some sellers or otherwise make them feel as though they’re already defeated. That’s not at all true! If you’re a Defendant, take action and hire an attorney today. With a lawyer on your side, you can respond in a timely manner, negotiate with the Plaintiff if appropriate, prove your identity, and/or find a reasonable or favorable resolution. The cost of hiring an attorney is certainly a worthwhile investment in this situation. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!  

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the NHL Trademark Infringement Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here