Rainbow Friends E-Commerce Lawsuit

May 9, 2023

Rainbow Friends has filed a lawsuit to purportedly “combat e-commerce store operators who trade upon Plaintiff’s reputation and goodwill by selling and/or offering for sale Unauthorized Rainbow Friends Products.” The suit alleges that you are selling copyright infringing Rainbow Friends products to customers in the United States. Additionally, the suit specifies that you are intentionally using “Seller Aliases.” The claim is that you are doing so to obscure your true identity and the details of your business dealings. 

At this point, your online seller accounts are stymied by a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). As an e-commerce seller, you are probably experiencing the type of frustration that accompanies these lawsuits. Let us have a conversation to determine if you have actually done anything wrong. Please remain calm! We are here to illuminate the details. We are here to guide you through any potential confusion. And, we are here to reset the equilibrium of your working life so that you can get on your way to making that money! ?

According to the notice, authorized Rainbow Friends products include phone cases, backpacks, stickers, tote bags, bedding, stationary, and apparel. The suit posits “Genuine Rainbow Friends Products are sold only through authorized retail channels and are recognized by the public as being exclusively associated with Plantiff’s Rainbow Friends game and brand.” 

By all means, definitely respond to the notice you received! That way, you can steer clear of a default judgment. AVOID! It is absolutely not in the best interest of your business. 

As noted in the complaint, Rainbow Friends contends that multiple e-commerce sellers in China and other “foreign jurisdictions with lax intellectual property enforcement systems” separately or with one another, consciously run one or more online account(s). It says the Defendants do so in such a way that it is “virtually impossible” for anyone to know their real identity and/or apparent network. However, the notice further states that Rainbow Friends will revise these claims if the named sellers produce legitimate identifying information.

Equally important, you ought to understand that the online e-commerce platforms delineated in the complaint are Amazon, eBay, Wish.com, Etsy, DHgate, AliExpress, Alibaba, and Walmart. So if you have sold Rainbow Friends products on any of these platforms, that could be the reason why you were named in the lawsuit. 

Be that as it may, the Plaintiff Rainbow Friends also states that the e-commerce platforms identified previously are responsible. How is that exactly? Well, they allegedly “do not adequately subject new sellers to verification and confirmation of their identities, allowing infringers” to get away with preventing people from knowing who they truly are with regard to name and address. 

Moreover, Rainbow Friends has accused online sellers of “designing the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing customers to be authorized online retailers.” Which is to say, the Plaintiff is saying you are going out of your way to dupe folks into buying something they believe is genuine, but is not.   

Further Details of the Lawsuit Filed by Rainbow Friends Claiming Copyright Infringement 

In particular, the lawsuit describes how the named e-commerce sellers purvey “Unauthorized Rainbow Friends Products [] manufactured by and [] from a common source and that Defendants are interrelated.” Meaning, the Plaintiff suggests that you and all other sellers listed in the complaint know each other and actively work in tandem to defraud the public. 

Continuing, the notice argues that the Defendants communicate via QQ.com chat rooms and sites like kuajingvs.com, sellerdefense.cn, and kaidianyo.com to determine “tactics for operating multiple accounts, evading detection, pending litigation, and potential new lawsuits.” 

Another claim is that sellers are utilizing “off-shore bank accounts” to shuffle monies outside the purview of the Court in which this suit was filed, based on an “analysis of financial transaction logs from previous similar cases.” 

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is a preeminent intellectual property law firm with a stalwart team of attorneys ready and waiting to help you! We are aware that many of the claims waged against you may simply not be true. To boot, we know how unnerving this kind of accusation can be! Especially when it has disrupted the ongoing flow of your business operations. Let’s talk! We have developed innovative and seamless solutions to problems such as these time and again for countless satisfied clients. We are confident we may offer you the same!

We trust this content was useful! Peep our blog for updates on cases like this one and other legal matters related to intellectual property.  Up next we will be discussing Dyson Suing for Patent Infringement.

See below for a link to the complaint itself

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here