Deckers Lawsuit Against E-Commerce Sellers

May 23, 2023

Deckers lawsuit against e-commerce sellers. Have you sold Deckers-owned UGG footwear products on Amazon, Etsy, Wish.com, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, or DHgate? Consequently, you may have received a legal notice naming you in a patent infringement lawsuit. The insufficient “verification and confirmation” of your seller identity on these “third party service providers” may be the leading cause of the issue. The result, however, remains the same. A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is holding your business back from generating money. 

Should I Respond to the Notice? 

Understandably, you may want to push the notice aside and go on about your day. This is not the move to make! RESPOND TO THE NOTICE OR YOU MAY HAVE TO FACE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT! In a sense, a Default Judgment could mean the end of the road for this case. Essentially, it will only benefit you to provide a response. Failure to respond will likely further negatively impact your business. 

Case No. 23-cv-02600: Deckers/UGG

Patent Infringement suit filed by Deckers. The lawsuit claims that you and the other Defendants may “reside and/or operate in the People’s Republic of China or other foreign jurisdictions with lax intellectual property enforcement systems.” To add onto that, Deckers states you are using “tactics” to “conceal [your] identity and the full scope of [your] operation” as part of an elaborate scheme to sell infringing products to consumers in the United States. 

Sold UGGs? Patent Infringement Lawsuit

Another key point, the lawsuit also claims, “Defendants facilitate sales by designing e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers.” 

You have strategically curated an online presence that makes customers believe you are selling “authorized” products, per the notice.

Not only has that claim been made, but also that “Defendants regularly register or acquire new seller aliases for the purpose of offering for sale and selling Infringing Products.” Deckers has put forth that you have taken “willful” action “under multiple fictitious aliases” or fake names so that your identity remains unclear. In this case, removing the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) from your account(s) may be accomplished by verifying your identity. 

Defendant in Deckers Lawsuit? 

Do you “maintain off-shore bank accounts”? How about “regularly move funds from [your] financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to Deckers”? These claims were made, too. However, their validity remains in question. Indeed, the notice itself relays that these statements are based on “analysis of financial account transaction logs from previous similar cases.” Which means, they may be irrelevant when it comes to you and your business. 

Perhaps you use sites like sellerdefense.cn, kaidianyo.com, kuajingvs.com, and QQ.com to communicate with other sellers. That communication, though, may not be for discussion of “tactics for operating multiple accounts, evading detection, pending litigation, and potential new lawsuits.” 

If you know you are not “working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Infringing Products,” we can help you clear your name.  

UGG Patent Infringement

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is equipped with the exact expertise and legal wherewithal to alleviate your intellectual property conundrum! We have solved problems like yours for a wide variety of global clients. Come on now, contact us!

We trust this content was useful! Peep our blog for updates on cases like this one and other legal matters related to intellectual property. Up next we will be discussing Christian Dior’s Infringement Lawsuit.  

See below for a link to the complaint itself ⚖️

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here