Supreme Counterfeit and Trademark Infringement Action

Jun 28, 2025

Street Wear Brand Supreme Sues E-Commerce Sellers Over Counterfeit Sales

If you’ve been sued by Supreme over allegations of counterfeiting and trademark infringement, know that you need to respect the gravity of the situation! A trademark infringement lawsuit waged by a brand such as Supreme can have a significant impact on your operations. You may want to evaluate your legal options in light of the lawsuit. The sooner you act, the better, because you’ll want to be ahead of the game, instead of behind. When it comes to intellectual property law firms, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is second to none. No matter how much money your e-commerce business generates, we want to protect what matters most to you! Let’s talk about the Supreme counterfeit and trademark infringement action affecting online sellers.

Our firm is spearheaded by award-winning attorneys with an unmatched level of knowledge and experience in terms of e-commerce and the law. We’re always excited to meet new clients and take on their cases because intellectual property law is our passion! To ensure you have a streamlined experience when working with Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, our attorneys and team maintain a clear and open line of communication, always. Need to ask a question or relay a concern? We want to know! Our clients are e-commerce operators based in all corners of the globe, so we’re available as often as is necessary.

Supreme’s Action is Predicated on Infringement Allegations | Supreme Counterfeit and Trademark Infringement Action

As you will learn from the details of the case, the Supreme trademark lawsuit is predicated on a series of allegations. These allegations highlight certain “unlawful” activities that the Defendants collectively engaged in. A key aspect of the lawsuit, with respect to these allegations, is that the claims of counterfeit are being applied in a collective sense. What we mean is that it’s Supreme’s intention to determine via the court that the Defendants are interrelated in their infringement actions. That is, the Plaintiff says that the named sellers form a counterfeit network. Through which they trade information to more effectively sell unauthorized products. Are all of the Defendants guilty of the alleged unlawful actions? Not necessarily, which is why working with our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is so crucial!

Sellers can expect that Supreme will get the court to approve a temporary restraining order, thereby freezing the Defendants’ accounts. All seller accounts relevant to the lawsuit will be frozen, rendering funds in those accounts inaccessible. Primarily, the restraining order will target earnings connected to the sale of Supreme products. It’s also possible that the injunction may affect revenue that came from the sale of different branded goods, too. It stands to reason that based on this information alone, any given named seller can easily see how serious this legal action is. It’s unlikely that any e-commerce seller wants to be blocked from touching their own money. Furthermore, you’ll probably want to regain access to your money as soon as possible. Our firm can help you achieve the resolution you need!

Providing a Response to the Court is Essential! | Supreme Counterfeit and Trademark Infringement Action

One of the more key things affected sellers must do is provide a response to the court! Without a response, the court may take that as an indication that a given Defendant may deserve further penalty. Generally, the absence of a response may give the court reason to issue a Default Judgment. If/when a DJ is issued, the decision is more often than not permanent and can be very costly. Don’t dig yourself deeper into a more complicated matter. Our firm believes sellers ought to consider simply responding in a timely fashion. If you require assistance with the response itself, our team is pleased to assist!

Interested in pursuing a direct settlement versus retaining an attorney? All named Defendants are entitled to take this path for resolution. But, it may not ultimately be in their best interest. We say this because the average settlement amount between sellers and brands like Supreme is 60% of your frozen funds. Potentially, this could mean that Supreme gets awarded nearly half of your money! Would you rather walk away from the Supreme trademark infringement lawsuit with more than half of your earnings? Don’t hesitate to contact the law firm of Stockman & Poropat, PLLC! 

A Snapshot of Supreme’s Infringement Allegations | Supreme Counterfeit Lawsuit

Take a peek at some of these allegations noted in the legal complaint, which you can download at the bottom of this page:

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases look sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. 

Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the SUPREME Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Supreme Products. 

Defendants are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the SUPREME Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Read up about the latest NBA Trademark Infringement Action – E-Commerce Sellers Accused of Forming Counterfeit Network to Sell Infringing Products

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here