Trademark First Use vs. First Use in Commerce | Filing a Trademark Application

Jul 9, 2024

Filing a Trademark Application | Trademark First Use vs. First Use in Commerce

Are you determined to understand trademark first use vs. first use in commerce? The difference isn’t really all that complicated at all! Although, you’ll want to know that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) makes a distinction between the two. So that your trademark application won’t be denied. 

Per the USPTO, the date of first use anywhere refers to the date when goods or services were initially sold under a specific trademark either in the US or another country. While first use in commerce is the date when goods or services were sold using the mark in actual commerce between states or the US and another country.

Why is the date of first use such an important piece of information? When registering your trademark, the USPTO requires that you identify the date of first use anywhere and use in commerce. These dates prove that your trademark truly exists. If the mark is not actively in use, then the trademark doesn’t truly exist. The dates of first use establish to the USPTO the use of the mark as it’s intended.

What Does Date of First Use Mean for Trademark Applicants?

Let’s more thoroughly flesh out what the date of first use anywhere means for trademark applicants. The date of first use anywhere is when your products were first sold or transported. Additionally, this date may be defined as the date on which you completed your terms of service under the service mark. It’s a date that pertains to domestic and international applicants, wherever the mark was first used. So it could be national, local, within or between states, and/or any other manner. 

Similarly, to identify the date of first use in commerce, you’ll determine the first date of sale or transportation. Or, the completion of terms of service. But the mark’s usage has to be “bona fide” and in a way that’s regulated by the US Congress. Commerce regulated by Congress means the trademark was used to transport or sell merchandise, or the provision of services, to customers who live out of state. The federal trademark law in the US declares that use in commerce must be shown as “the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.” You have to provide evidence of authentic and genuine usage of the mark. 

If it so happens that your product or service was first sold in a form of trade that’s regulated by Congress, then the date of first use anywhere and first use in commerce will actually be the same date. 

How to Prove Bona Fide Use of a Mark? Trademark First Use vs. First Use in Commerce

How do you prove you’ve truthfully used your mark on the date of first use in commerce? That depends on whether you’re offering products or services! So, for goods, you need to show that the mark is displayed on those goods, on the packaging, or on displays. And, you have to show that the goods were legitimately sold or transported. Regarding services, applicants have to demonstrate that the mark was used to promote or sell their services. And that the services were provided in a commercial context. 

The USPTO further requires that trademark owners prove that they’ve made meaningful sales of their goods or services. There isn’t necessarily a quantity quota that you need to meet. However, you have to show that actual sales were made to prove bona fide use in commerce. For example, the USPTO might consider the sale of goods to friends and family, or the provision of services for free, as sham sales. The requirement of meaningful sales could also be called into question if the transactions are not consistent. Why? Because that may indicate the mark hasn’t been used in the ordinary course of trade. 

Maintain Proper Documentation to Prove Your Date of First Use in Commerce

For sure, when establishing your date of first use in commerce, you can present documentation of a small amount of sales and/or free offerings via promotion if that usage was authentic. Definitely have the proper documentation! The USPTO may wish to see proof of your marketing efforts and so forth, within your industry, that relate to the bona fide use of the mark in commerce. 

The difference between the date of first use in commerce and first use anywhere isn’t trivial! You’ll want to distinguish these dates very clearly. Even if they’re the same. That way you can avoid having the USPTO deny your trademark application. If the incorrect date of use is recorded, the mark’s registration could be challenged. Can the date of first use be difficult to determine? Possibly! Especially if the development of the products or services occurred across a span of time, rather than just on one single day.

In instances where the date of first use is unknown, you may submit the month and year in your trademark application. The USPTO will then assume the final date of the month is your date of first use. And, when applicants only know the year of first use, without a month or day, the USPTO will select the last day of December as the date. 

Avoid Getting Your TM Application Denied

Again, you have to demonstrate that you’ve had bona fide sales in order to achieve trademark protection! What if you’ve only shipped products to your friends or family? Sold a few items below market value for promotional reasons? Shipped goods only one time? Or had inconsistent shipments of products that are typically sold in large quantities? This could lead the USPTO to question the legitimacy of your use in commerce date. 

Both the date of first use anywhere and date of first use in commerce have to be submitted to the USPTO. And if a change to those dates has to be made after the submission of your trademark application? You are entitled to file an amendment. That amendment, however, will need to be supported with a declaration or affidavit. And, if the first use date happens to be later than the date when you signed the application, but prior to it being filed, you are permitted to provide clarification of the date of first use (because you can’t declare use in the future). 

When seeking trademark protection and registration, you’ll want to adhere to the rules, regulations, and laws so that you get a USPTO approval!

To ensure you’re applying for trademark registration properly, you can rely on our incredible team. Have questions? Contact us at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation!

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here