Universal City Studios Counterfeit Action | Online Sellers Facing Infringement Allegations

Apr 28, 2025

Universal City Trademark & Copyright Infringement Action

Universal City Studios has filed an infringement action in federal court! The company cites the sale of counterfeit, unauthorized products protected by their trademarks and copyright as the reason for the lawsuit. With an infringement lawsuit such as this, any Defendant in the case will want to provide a timely response to the court. By doing as much, sellers can alleviate the possibility of a Default Judgment. And, it will provide the court with the necessary acknowledgment. So that the Defendants can enter into a legal process of resolution! 

That’s what we’re all about at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC! We want to support you as an online seller and develop a legal strategy aimed at achieving your desired outcome. It’s as important to our firm as it is to your business that your operation doesn’t sustain an insurmountable loss of any kind. We want to see you get back up on top and sell products that make your customers smile! Regardless of the allegations contained within the Universal City Studios case, our team is going to fight for you. 

What’s the deal with Universal filing this trademark and copyright infringement suit anyway? As in, what motivated the Plaintiff to accuse a group of online sellers of intellectual property infringement? Let’s dive into the details a bit. So, Universal alleges that a collective band of online sellers sold a bunch of counterfeit goods to consumers in the United States. Given that the Plaintiff describes these actions as collective, they’re seeking to establish that the sellers are a “network.” By extension, Universal is contending that this alleged network was formed for the express purpose of selling infringing products. 

Universal Claims Counterfeit Network Sold Numerous Products Online

The Plaintiff’s allegations related to the sale of counterfeit products are compelling for the court. Because of the supposed result of these actions. That is, Universal alleges that the Defendants’ collective unlawful action as a counterfeit network has led to a loss of revenue. Additionally, the Plaintiff says their reputation has been damaged due to a compromise in consumer trust. Consider the totality of what Universal City Studios states the named sellers engaged in. It stands to reason that the lawsuit is a sensible legal act. Based on the allegations, the Plaintiff wants to interrupt the flow of counterfeit products on the market. 

Which infringing products are all of these allegations of counterfeit connected to? The legal complaint specifies that the trademarks and/or copyright in question are related to certain properties owned by Universal City Studios. These include products branded under the Despicable Me, Fast & Furious, E.T., and Jaws franchises. 

The Defendants will need to address the lawsuit in order to fully protect and continue their e-commerce operations. Why’s that? Universal City Studios is going to have the court approve a temporary restraining order. The injunction will freeze all relevant online seller accounts across the appropriate marketplaces. As a result of the restraining order, sellers will be blocked from accessing the money generated from the sale of Universal-protected products. Until the allegations are addressed and/or a resolution is reached, the money will remain tied up. This may be slightly confusing. But even with the allegations not yet being proven by any stretch, the Plaintiff has the power to essentially shut down the Defendants’ businesses. 

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is THE Law Firm for Intellectual Property Issues

Given all of the above, it makes turning to our firm at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC quite an easy decision! Our incredible attorneys and team are uber-prepared to help you get through this e-commerce roadblock. We possess a superior level of experience dealing with legal matters in the online selling world. Our lawyers are eager to learn the ins-and-outs of your e-commerce business. We’ll use that information to develop a legal strategy tailor-made for your precise goals and needs! 

As an affected seller, you may want to look into what options there are for direct settlements. Sometimes Defendants want to pursue a direct settlement with brands and companies like Universal. As it may provide an expedited outcome. Which is beneficial in its own right. But we want the affected sellers to know that it may come with some level of forfeiture. On average, direct settlements in infringement cases with entities like Universal land at around 60%. Therefore, if you were to take this route, there’s a possibility that the Plaintiff may be awarded more than half of the frozen money in your seller accounts. If you’re keen on a different sort of outcome, reach out to our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC! 

To round out this article, we’re going to share a few excerpts from the legal complaint. Feel free to download the complaint at the bottom of this page: 

The success of Plaintiff’s brand has resulted in significant counterfeiting of the Universal Trademarks and copying of the Universal Copyrighted Works. In recent years, Plaintiff has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering Unauthorized Products on online marketplace platforms, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases.

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of its Universal Trademarks or copy or redistribute the Universal Copyrighted Works, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Universal Products.

Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the Universal Trademarks and/or copies of the Universal Copyrighted Works in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Unauthorized Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next read up on how yet again Hallmark Sued Online Sellers for Allegedly Selling Infringing Goods to Consumers in the US

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here