Vogue Counterfeit, Infringement Lawsuit | Trademark Action

Feb 25, 2025

Trademark Action | Vogue Counterfeit, Infringement Lawsuit

Are you a know-it-all when it comes to trademark infringement actions? Do you know exactly what to do when a big, multi-million or billion dollar company is suing you for infringing on their intellectual property? Have you been involved in the e-commerce universe for so long that nothing phases or surprises you? If you answered no to all or most of these rhetorical questions, don’t worry! At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we can answer YES to these inquiries, and in doing so, save your business both time and money.

Today’s post is about the latest Vogue trademark infringement action against online sellers! Now that you’ve received notice that you’re a Defendant in the case, you need to act. Procrastinating in this instance could be detrimental. To be clear, this is a federal intellectual property infringement lawsuit filed in federal court. There’s little about the lawsuit that isn’t extremely serious! But, there’s no need to freak out! Our attorneys and team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC are here to help you navigate and resolve this matter.

What can online sellers do that doesn’t cost any additional money? Read the legal complaint! We’ve provided a downloadable link at the bottom of this page. You may know that reading is fundamental, but it’s also a way to stay informed! In this case, sellers should try and understand the allegations made against their businesses. Vogue alleges a list of so-called unlawful activities that the named sellers engaged in. Among these claims, Vogue says the Defendants formed a type of counterfeit network. Through this alleged network, sellers have communicated with one another, per the Plaintiff, to actively sell as many counterfeit goods as they can.

Even if you don’t believe you engaged in the unlawful practices described by Vogue, you should still retain legal counsel! The allegations will have an impact on your business, even though they are just allegations. The federal context for Vogue’s claims means that the court is going to adjudicate in accordance with the law. As such, you deserve to also protect yourself and your business. Make sure you respond to the lawsuit to avoid getting hit with a Default Judgment, too!

Stockman & Poropat, PLLC has developed successful legal strategies for e-commerce sellers all around the world and we’re eager to do the same for you!

Herein, we’ll share a few paragraphs from the legal complaint to give sellers and readers a more well-rounded idea about the Vogue trademark infringement action:

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases look sophisticated and accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts, via credit cards, Alipay, Amazon Pay, and/or PayPal. 

E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often include content and images that make it very difficult for consumers to distinguish such stores from an authorized retailer. Plaintiff has not licensed or authorized Defendants to use any of the VOGUE Trademarks, and none of the Defendants are authorized retailers of genuine Vogue Products.

Defendants are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the VOGUE Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet. 

Vogue Institutes Temporary Restraining Order

As we mentioned, sellers will be impacted by the Vogue trademark infringement lawsuit. Just how? By a temporary restraining order! Yes, this Schedule A infringement suit is aimed at stopping the Defendants from selling more counterfeit products to consumers. To that end, the Plaintiff will request and likely get the court’s approval for a temporary injunction. How does the restraining order prevent sellers from selling Vogue branded goods? It freezes your seller accounts and the money in them becomes inaccessible. The TRO usually just affects the money gained from the sale of a given Plaintiff’s goods, but could also apply to other money, as well. And, the reason for the injunction? Vogue wants to repair their allegedly damaged reputation and halt further loss of revenue.

E-commerce operators may be curious about how they might settle the issue with Vogue without an attorney. This approach usually involves trying to reach a settlement directly with the Plaintiff. While sellers are perfectly capable of doing so, on average, direct settlements result in sellers receiving just 60% of the money in their seller accounts. That’s why you should retain legal counsel! We can use our incredible, in-depth experience in the legal arena of e-commerce to get you an outcome that doesn’t equate to a total loss!

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation! 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce Trademark Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here