Vogue Trademark Infringment Action | Online Sellers Sued

Jan 10, 2025

Vogue Counterfeit Allegations | Trademark Infringment

Vogue has moved forward with a federal intellectual property infringement lawsuit! The online sellers named in the action will have to consider their options in light of the suit. What’s the strongest way to defend yourself against the allegations asserted by Vogue? Hiring an intellectual property attorney!

The thing sellers ought to grasp is that the alternative to working with an attorney could cost them additional financial strain. How would figuring out a resolution without using an attorney lead to loss? Well, a direct settlement with the Plaintiff is an often-considered option. In the majority of instances, this route results in sellers receiving only 60% of their hard-earned money. At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we don’t believe that sellers should get less than they deserve. We work hard to fight for the best outcome available to sellers, given the circumstances. Ultimately, online sellers rely on their earnings to continue their operation. As such, we want to see affected Defendants walk away with what they need, rather than what the Plaintiff is willing to give them.

Schedule A Infringment Means Temporary Restraining Order

As the Defendants may be aware, Schedule A infringement lawsuits come with temporary restraining orders. These injunctions are intended to stop the named sellers from offering counterfeit goods to consumers. According to Vogue’s allegations, unauthorized products were sold by the Defendants on multiple online platforms. These unlawful actions, states the Plaintiff, have damaged the Vogue brand. And, that damage has been so significant, says Vogue, that they’ve decided to file a federal infringement lawsuit.

The restraining order, though temporary, can have a lasting effect if the lawsuit isn’t addressed appropriately. While the TRO is in play, the sellers won’t be able to access their online accounts. That’s correct, the injunction prevents the Defendants from touching the money they themselves earned. Due to this freeze, online sellers also won’t be able to withdraw any funds. When this is all happening, it could plunge some of the sellers into a difficult financial situation. However the Vogue lawsuit strikes your e-commerce business, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC can help!

Vogue Trademark Lawsuit | What the Brand Claims

The Vogue trademark lawsuit contains several allegations of counterfeit. The entirety of the infringement allegations are described in the legal complaint. Let’s take a look at a selection of those IP infringement claims below:

Defendants [] deceive unknowing consumers by using the VOGUE Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e-commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Vogue Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using the VOGUE Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Vogue Products.

Defendants are working to knowingly and willfully import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products in the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Defendants, without any authorization or license from Plaintiff, have knowingly and willfully used and continue to use the VOGUE Trademarks in connection with the advertisement, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States and Illinois over the Internet.

[Sellers’] unauthorized use of the VOGUE Trademarks in connection with the advertising, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of Counterfeit Products into the United States, including Illinois, is likely to cause and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception by and among consumers and is irreparably harming Plaintiff.

On Information and Belief… Vogue Sues Sellers

Vogue’s reason for filing the lawsuit is not restricted to one allegation. The Plaintiff has gathered information and believes that the Defendants have created a network to better establish their counterfeiting actions. By using off-shore accounts, Vogue claims sellers avoid paying damages. Furthermore, they communicate with one another by way of specific channels to share best practices for essentially getting away with infringement. Though not all of this is automatically true for every Defendant, the sellers will all be impacted by the lawsuit. This is why working with a trusted intellectual property attorney is so vital!

Given that the lawsuit has been filed, sellers should expect the incoming Vogue temporary restraining order. Unfortunately, the TRO isn’t something you can run from! Neither is the lawsuit. You need to respond to the lawsuit so that the court doesn’t issue a Default Judgment. If you’re not knowledgeable of how to compose that response, Stockman & Poropat, PLLC can certainly assist. We don’t want to see any of the sellers face a Default Judgment, because it can be expensive and is usually not able to be overturned. Respond to the lawsuit and hire an IP attorney!

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Federal Lululemon Trademark Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here