Volkswagen Lawsuit | Online Sellers Accused of Counterfeit | Trademark Infringement Allegations

Mar 13, 2024

Online Sellers Facing Trademark Infringement Allegations

Have you been notified that Volkswagen is suing you and other online sellers for trademark infringement? The Plaintiff, Volkswagen, is seeking “injunctive and monetary relief” for what they believe is rampant counterfeiting. Wondering what you should do next? Respond to the lawsuit! Even if you don’t believe your business has infringed on the company’s trademarks, the allegations will still impact your business. The best way to address these allegations is to issue an appropriate response. 

Not sure how to compose a response to the lawsuit? An intellectual property attorney can help write one up for you! The reason why it’s so imperative to respond? If you don’t you could lose thousands and thousands of dollars. The potential amount of loss varies from seller to seller. Either way, if you don’t respond you’ll certainly forfeit whatever money you’ve thus far made from selling Volkswagen goods. 

Volkswagen Lawsuit | Temporary Restraining Order

Perhaps the most harmful part of these Schedule A infringement lawsuits is the temporary restraining order that comes with them. Volkswagen’s claims of counterfeit will lead to a restraining order. That impacts sellers’ online accounts and prevents them from getting their money. If this has happened to your business, you know precisely how aggravating it can be! You’ve built an online business, grown a customer base, and established your store as a strong competitor. All of a sudden, the notice of the Volkswagen lawsuit shows up and a restraining order goes into effect.

As mentioned, the frozen monetary amount could be in the thousands. That’s not a small thing, by any means. That capital is the foundation for your business to survive, grow, and thrive. Frustratingly, even though Volkswagen’s claims are only allegations, the Defendants need to address the lawsuit in order to re-access their money. How does an online seller named in the suit regain that access? One way is by reaching a settlement. 

Why Do Big Brands File Schedule A Lawsuits?

Volkswagen and brands like it utilize the Schedule A lawsuit for counterfeit issues because they can claim many sellers infringed on their intellectual property. Following that, the company attempts to settle with the Defendants. Due to the quick turnaround of that path to resolution, many sellers go along. This is frequently disadvantageous for sellers! Many settlements in counterfeit lawsuits leave Defendants with just 60% of their frozen assets. For these reasons, it can greatly benefit sellers to use an intellectual property attorney to resolve the matter! 

As it states in the legal complaint, “on information and belief, Defendants reside and/or operate in the People’s Republic of China or other foreign jurisdictions.” Sellers based in China and elsewhere may be intimidated by the lawsuit. Either they don’t understand the United States legal system, how to retain legal counsel or that they can get a lawyer, and/or don’t feel confident that legal action is worthwhile. Quite frequently, sellers who use an attorney find more advantageous resolutions. Don’t be scared by the lawsuit! You are entitled to a fair and reasonable outcome, especially if you’re a seller who doesn’t believe you’ve done what Volkswagen is claiming. 

Volkswagen’s Claims of Counterfeit

Speaking of Volkswagen’s claims of counterfeit – below are a selection of the brand’s allegations of trademark infringement:

E-commerce store operators like Defendants commonly engage in fraudulent conduct when registering the Seller Aliases by providing false, misleading and/or incomplete information to e-commerce platforms to prevent discovery of their true identities and the scope of their e-commerce operation.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants regularly register or acquire new seller aliases for the purpose of offering for sale and selling Counterfeit Volkswagen Products. Such seller alias registration patterns are one of many common tactics used by e-commerce store operators like Defendants to conceal their identities and the full scope and interworking of their counterfeiting operation, and to avoid being shut down. 

Counterfeiters such as Defendants typically operate under multiple Seller Aliases and payment accounts so that they can continue operation in spite of Volkswagen’s enforcement. E-commerce store operators like Defendants maintain off-shore bank accounts and regularly move funds from their financial accounts to off-shore accounts outside the jurisdiction of this Court to avoid payment of any monetary judgment awarded to Volkswagen. 

Intellectual Property Attorneys Exist for a Reason!

The sellers affected by the lawsuit have sold Volkswagen products on Alibaba, Walmart, Amazon, Etsy, Temu, and other platforms. Any of the Defendants should respond to the lawsuit! Maybe none of the allegations apply to your business operation. Perhaps you unknowingly sold goods that were counterfeit. No matter the details of your online seller account(s), you need to respond! If you ignore the existence of the suit or walk away, the money that’s frozen because of the restraining order will be given to Volkswagen. The same goes for settlements – the percentage you don’t keep goes to the company. Your intellectual property attorney can work with Volkswagen on your behalf to develop a solution that benefits you and your online business. 

Contact Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free consultation! Our team will work directly with you to figure out the most effective way to move your business forward while keeping as much of your money as possible. 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the Bluey Counterfeit Lawsuit.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here