Vorys Cease and Desist Letter | Understanding C&D Letters

Sep 10, 2023

What is a Vorys Cease and Desist Letter?

Simply, a cease and desist letter (C&D) is a letter sent to a person or company who has allegedly engaged in misconduct, which demands they stop engaging in that misconduct. Vorys is a large firm that sends out a lot of these letters to Amazon sellers. Vorys sends these C&D letters to sellers who have allegedly sold unauthorized or counterfeit products. The result of the claims described in these letters may lead to your account getting suspended. 

The Vorys law firm is known to regularly accuse sellers of various intellectual property infringements. The message is typically the same. Stop selling the products of a given brand, because you are not authorized to do so. The C&D letter basically functions like a threat, and theoretically, precedes a lawsuit. The claims in the letter may or may not be true. Nevertheless, the fact of their existence can cause sellers problems, such as suspension. 

Why Did I Receive a Vorys Cease and Desist Letter?

First off, you should determine if the sender of the cease and desist letter is legitimate. Some competitors on the Amazon platform send out or submit fake C&D’s and/or infringement claims. They do this to eliminate you as their competition. You may be unable to validate that the sender is associated with the brand in question or their attorney. Know that you can ask the sender for further details. 

We recommend that you respond to the claims detailed in the cease and desist letter. If you are not selling unauthorized or counterfeit products, reply and state that the claims have no merit. The brand who Vorys wrote the letter for may believe the claims to be true. You can just request access to the documentation and perform a review of that material.  

If the cease and desist letter is legitimate, then you should take into consideration what is known as the First Sale Doctrine. This is what protects you from getting sued by a brand that does not wish for you to sell their goods on Amazon. Essentially, the doctrine means that when the brand sells their products to a retailer, distributor, or anyone else, any further sale of those products does not violate the brand’s trademark. Because the brand completed the initial sale. Conversely, if you manufacture a product and apply a trademarked logo to it and then sell it, you are indeed committing trademark infringement. 

Understanding the First Sale Doctrine

It may be confusing that you have received a cease and desist letter if you purchased the inventory from a distributor. You might assume that you are covered, in that case, by the First Sale Doctrine. Brands use what is referred to as the “Warranty Loophole.” This means, a brand claims you are an unauthorized seller. And, the extension of a manufacturer’s warranty is reserved only for authorized sellers. Therefore, you are infringing on that brand’s trademark. Brands have successfully sued Amazon sellers using this legal angle. 

What if the cease and desist letter sent to you is related to a product with a manufacturer’s warranty on the label or brand website? You may want to remove that listing from Amazon, reach out to the brand, and ask if you can sell the remainder of your inventory. This may be the most sensible decision. You are putting yourself at risk of being sued and/or losing in court due to the “Warranty Loophole” argument, which undermines the First Sale Doctrine. 

The C&D letter may refer to a product in question that does not have a manufacturer’s warranty. Then, you are not violating the First Sale Doctrine. Unfortunately, you can still be sued by a brand that claims you have infringed on their intellectual property. If a brand decides to file a lawsuit against an Amazon seller like you in the jurisdiction of Illinois, your account can be frozen by a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). That freeze will remain in effect until the suit is settled. You will not be able to access the funds in that account, as well. And, this is regardless of whether or not you have actually engaged in the wrongdoing claimed by the brand. 

Should I Hire an Attorney?

What if you purchased your inventory from a brand’s distributor in good faith? Perhaps you were unaware that you were required to acquire authorization to sell on Amazon. What you can do is contact the brand who sent you the C&D and request that you sell through the inventory. Taking this action usually resolves the issue. Although you will not be able to sell that brand’s products after that inventory runs out. 

Without a doubt, navigating the best route to take when you have received a cease and desist letter can seem overwhelming. Want to improve your chances of coming out of this situation relatively unscathed? Seriously consider using one of the most effective tools in the game, an intellectual property attorney! The firm of Stockman & Poropat, PLLC is a leader in the field with an impressive record of developing solutions for all sorts of Amazon sellers. Our team can analyze the Vorys letter, assess the validity of the claims therein, compose a response to the brand to negotiate a favorable outcome. If necessary, we can also defend you in the event of a lawsuit. Do not feel as though you must face the cease and desist letter allegations on your own. Our incredible team will work to get your Amazon business more earnings with less hassle. 

Up next we will be discussing Business Contract Lawyers.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York

Inheriting Property Without a Will in New York Inheriting property without a will in New York can create legal and financial complications that many families do not anticipate until after a loved one passes away. While people often plan for the future in many areas of...

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Glitch Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Glitch Productions Schedule A lawsuit targets online sellers accused of infringing intellectual property tied to The Amazing Digital Circus. On April 29, 2026, Glitch Productions Pty Ltd filed the action...

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained

Trademark Opposition Proceedings Explained A trademark application reaching publication does not automatically guarantee registration. During trademark opposition proceedings, third parties can challenge an application before the mark officially registers with the...

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Lululemon Schedule A Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers The Lululemon Schedule A lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on April 29, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-04901. In this action, Lululemon Athletica Inc. alleges trademark infringement connected to...

Real Estate Attorney vs Realtor in New York

Realtor vs Real Estate Attorney: What’s the Difference? If you are buying or selling property, understanding the difference between a realtor vs. a real estate attorney is essential. Both professionals play important roles in a transaction, but they serve very...

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark and AI Deepfakes

Taylor Swift Voice Trademark Signals a New Legal Strategy Against AI Deepfakes The Taylor Swift voice trademark filings are making headlines as one of the most forward-looking intellectual property strategies in response to artificial intelligence. In April 2026,...

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Beauty Blender Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Beauty Blender trademark lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On April 20, 2026, REA.DEEMING BEAUTY, INC. filed this action under Case No. 126-cv-03235, alleging...

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here