Canada Goose Trademark Infringement Action

Jan 8, 2025

January 2025 Canada Goose Infringement Lawsuit

Canada Goose is once again suing online sellers for trademark infringement! Are you one of the Defendants? Well, first off, you need to respond! Those online sellers who don’t respond will risk having to contend with a Default Judgment. When that happens, e-commerce operators will likely have to pay a costly sum. Not only that, it’s extremely difficult to overturn a judgment like that. So better to respond and address the lawsuit from the get go. Maybe you don’t agree with the allegations. Even in the face of that, a response is a sensible move and so is hiring an intellectual property attorney! 

Are all of the Defendants guilty of what Canada Goose alleges they did in terms of sales? Not necessarily across the board. Though the Plaintiff claims the Defendants acted as a network to offer counterfeit goods to consumers, you may or may not be guilty of as much. Every seller’s business details are individual. That’s why sellers ought to truly consider hiring an IP lawyer. You’ll want to give yourself the greatest opportunity to clear yourself of the allegations, if possible. And if that isn’t an option, the settlement and/or resolution you reach should be fair and reasonable. At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we do all we can to get you what you deserve!  

Let’s isolate the main issue Canada Goose has with the named online sellers. Canada Goose believes that the Defendants organized their efforts so as to sell unauthorized products. According to the Plaintiff, the methods of this network of counterfeiters were developed through certain channels of communication. To hedge their businesses against penalty, Canada Goose says sellers rely on off-shore accounts. Now, to reiterate, these allegations might apply to any given seller. And they might not. By collaborating with a legal team, you can protect your e-commerce operation so that you can continue your business without taking a major hit. 

Allegations of Counterfeit | Canada Goose Trademark Infringement Action

To fully grasp the details of the Canada Goose trademark infringement action, read through the legal complaint. Below, we’ll share excerpts from that legal complaint to give you a snippet of the infringement claims: 

Canada Goose has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering counterfeit Canada Goose Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Wish.com, Walmart, Etsy, DHgate, Temu, and TikTok, including the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases. The Seller Aliases target consumers in this Judicial District and throughout the United States. 

Defendants facilitate sales by designing e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers. 

[Sellers] also deceive unknowing consumers by using the CANADA GOOSE Trademarks without authorization within the content, text, and/or meta tags of their e- commerce stores to attract various search engines crawling the Internet looking for websites relevant to consumer searches for Canada Goose Products. Other e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases omit using CANADA GOOSE Trademarks in the item title to evade enforcement efforts while using strategic item titles and descriptions that will trigger their listings when consumers are searching for Canada Goose Products. 

A Temporary Restraining Order is En Route!

Guess what. The Canada Goose trademark infringement lawsuit means a temporary restraining order is on the way! The TRO will affect the entire group of the Defendants listed on the lawsuit’s Schedule A. As a federal lawsuit, Canada Goose is seeking to halt any additional sales of counterfeit products. That’s because the brand alleges the sale of these unauthorized goods has hurt their business. To what extent? To enough of a degree that they’ve taken this particular action. So, indeed, the lawsuit is very serious and must be addressed in a timely fashion. 

As the TRO takes effect, e-commerce operators will lose access to their seller accounts. The money in those online accounts will be frozen, too. Defendants won’t be able to withdraw that money either. For some of the Defendants, the Canada Goose restraining order could put their business in a precarious spot. But however the lawsuit impacts your e-commerce operation, you deserve to move forward with a rightful amount of those funds. You earned them! Stockman & Poropat, PLLC has gotten sellers all over the world outcomes that don’t fall short. We want to do the same for you! 

An intellectual property attorney may be viewed as an option, rather than an asset or requirement when dealing with the Canada Goose lawsuit. Here’s why it’s more of a benefit than anything else. A seller who attempts to reach a direct settlement with the Plaintiff will probably lose money. Reports have shown that direct settlements in Schedule A lawsuits like this result in Defendants receiving 60% of the frozen money in their accounts. That’s just about half of the money you earned selling those products. Does that sound fair? Not to our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC! We want to get you the absolute best resolution so that you can continue to earn and grow and be successful. 

Contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today for a free initial consultation!

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the latest Vogue Trademark Infringement Action.

We're Here To Help!


Contact us today for a free consultation, let us light the way to a resolution!

Check out our full blog!

Did you enjoy this story? Leave a comment below and check out our other articles!

Amazon Request Payment Button: What Sellers Need to Know About DD+7

Amazon Request Payment Button: Understanding DD+7 for Sellers The Amazon Request Payment Button is appearing for more sellers as Amazon expands access to manual payout controls under its DD+7 reserve framework. The feature itself is not entirely new. However, its...

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers

Mattel Schedule A Lawsuit Filed Against Online Sellers The Mattel Schedule A lawsuit filed on April 14, 2026, in Case No. 1:26-cv-04164, adds another major brand name to the growing list of companies pursuing aggressive trademark enforcement against online sellers....

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Why USPTO Rejected B9

Bronny James Trademark Denial: Inside the USPTO Rejection of the B9 Logo Bronny James trademark denial has become one of the most talked-about branding stories in the sports business this month, and for good reason. Nike’s attempt to register Bronny James’ stylized B9...

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Milwaukee Trademark Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New SDNY Filing Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has filed a new Milwaukee trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on April 2, 2026, under Case No. 1:26-cv-02721-LAP. This...

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What Sellers Should Know

Amazon Fuel Surcharge 2026: What It Means for Sellers Amazon has introduced a new fuel and logistics-related surcharge that will affect sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). This Amazon fuel surcharge 2026 may appear incremental, but it reflects a broader shift...

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers

Toho TRO Lawsuit Targets Online Sellers in New York The Toho TRO lawsuit targets online sellers in the Southern District of New York. On March 20, 2026, Toho filed this action under Case No. 1:26-cv-02303. The company relies on a temporary restraining order (TRO) to...

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: Reverse Confusion Explained

Taylor Swift Trademark Case: When Big Brands Overwhelm Smaller Marks You build your brand the right way. You invest years into your name, your audience, and your identity. You secure a federal trademark. Then a global superstar enters the market with a nearly...

New York Takes on Loot Boxes: Are They Illegal Gambling?

New York Targets Video Game “Loot Boxes” as Illegal Gambling The question of whether loot box gambling under New York laws applies to modern video games is now front and center. The New York State Attorney General’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Valve...

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Breakdown

Katy Perry Trademark Dispute Comes to an End The Katy Perry trademark dispute has officially come to a close after more than 15 years of litigation, with the High Court of Australia ruling in favor of Australian fashion designer Katie Perry. The decision allows the...

Tendernism Trademark: A Lesson in Brand Protection

The Tendernism Trademark Story: A Lesson in Protecting the Brand People Associate With You The Tendernism trademark story is a clear example of how quickly a viral phrase can evolve into something much more valuable. In the age of social media, a single phrase can...

Let's work together

Please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re happy to answer any question you may have, whether big or small. Our team is dedicated to guiding you to a resolution to your issue.

Don’t hesitate!

Click Here