Online Sellers Sued | Dyson Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

The major technology brand Dyson, known for its vacuum cleaners and hair dryers, has filed a new trademark infringement lawsuit. The legal complaint introduces the lawsuit by stating:

This action has been filed by Dyson to combat e-commerce store operators who trade upon Dyson’s reputation and goodwill by offering for sale and/or selling unauthorized and unlicensed products, including personal styling tools and related accessories, using infringing and counterfeit versions of Dyson’s federally registered trademarks. 

The Plaintiff, Dyson, believes that online sellers have infringed on their intellectual property. According to the brand, the Defendants have sold fake Dyson goods to consumers in the United States. As a consequence of the alleged infringement, Dyson has sustained financial losses and tarnishment of their international reputation. These claims are yet to be proven true by the court. Nonetheless, the online sellers who’re getting sued for counterfeiting will have to address the lawsuit. Furthermore, the filing of the lawsuit will lead to a restraining order. The temporary restraining order will freeze the seller’s online accounts.

Dyson Claims Sellers Engaged in Counterfeiting

Here are some of Dyson’s allegations in more detail:

On information and belief, Defendants, either individually or jointly, operate one or more e-commerce stores under the Seller Aliases listed in Schedule A attached hereto. Tactics used by Defendants to conceal their identities and the full scope of their operation make it virtually impossible for Dyson to learn Defendants’ true identities and the exact interworking of their counterfeit network. If Defendants provide additional credible information regarding their identities, Dyson will take appropriate steps to amend the Complaint.

In recent years, Dyson has identified many fully interactive, e-commerce stores offering counterfeit Dyson Products on online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Alibaba, Wish.com, Walmart, Etsy, DHgate, and Temu including the e- commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases.

Defendants concurrently employ and benefit from substantially similar advertising and marketing strategies. For example, Defendants facilitate sales by the designing e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases so that they appear to unknowing consumers to be authorized online retailers, outlet stores, or wholesalers.

E-commerce store operators like Defendants regularly register or acquire new seller aliases for the purpose of offering for sale and selling Counterfeit Dyson Products. Such seller alias registration patterns are one of many common tactics used by e-commerce store operators like Defendants to conceal their identities and the full scope and interworking of their counterfeiting operation, and to avoid being shut down.  

Dyson’s TRO | How Sellers Will Be Affected

As mentioned, Dyson will get the court to approve a temporary restraining order (TRO). That restraining order is ostensibly set into motion so the Plaintiff can halt any further damage to their intellectual property. Dyson intends to not only stop the counterfeiting. They also want to collect as much capital as they can from the Defendants. That’s so they can replace the funds they’ve lost due to the alleged trademark infringement. 

After the restraining order is in motion, Dyson will attempt to reach direct settlements with the online sellers they’re suing. If a seller chooses to directly settle with Dyson? They can expect to hand over around 60% of the frozen money in their seller account! Sellers may view working directly with the Plaintiff on a settlement as a way to move on. But it’s not necessarily the most beneficial avenue to go down. How do sellers negotiate a legitimately fair settlement? Or, how can sellers “provide additional credible information regarding their identities” so that Dyson will amend the allegations against them? Well, by retaining legal counsel and relying on an intellectual property attorney! 

Retain a Lawyer, Improve Your Outcome

Sellers affected by the newest Dyson trademark infringement lawsuit can utilize an intellectual property attorney to their advantage. Once sellers receive notice that they’re being sued, they’ll have to respond to the court. Following that, the Defendants will either have to submit information about their identity or business practices, or negotiate with Dyson. From the very beginning to the resolution, e-commerce operators who’re getting sued for infringement will likely find a better outcome with the aid of an attorney! 

Whether you’re annoyed, incensed, or confused, hiring an intellectual property lawyer is considered a sensible decision when navigating a federal lawsuit. We completely empathize with online sellers! Being accused of trademark infringement, by Dyson or any other big brand, is a huge, expensive inconvenience. Your daily business operation will not operate as usual. That could mean your business loses valuable customers and/or resources until the lawsuit is resolved. Therefore, you’ll want to address and resolve the matter in an expeditious fashion.

Dyson Schedule A Infringement Lawsuit

Another detail the Defendants may wish to understand is that this is a particular Schedule A infringement lawsuit. The essence of a Schedule A suit is that it gives the Plaintiff, Dyson, the ability to file the lawsuit against several online sellers in one action. Based on that, Dyson will aim to negotiate direct settlements as much as they can. We suggest that if you’re a seller named in the suit that you try not to be intimidated! There’s certainly cause to take the lawsuit seriously – it’s a serious accusation that affects your business. However, you’re not without options whatsoever. Take time to read through the legal complaint, comprehend the allegations to the best of your ability, and then secure the help of an intellectual property attorney.

If you’re one of the sellers getting sued by Dyson for trademark infringement, contact our team at Stockman & Poropat, PLLC today! We offer a free initial consultation. 

Download the legal complaint below:

Up next we will be discussing the newest Poppy Playtime Infringement Lawsuit.