Queen B Productions Schedule A Lawsuit: What Online Sellers Need to Know

Queen “B” Productions, the company behind the trademarks associated with the horror icon Elvira, has filed a new Schedule A lawsuit against online sellers accused of selling counterfeit merchandise.

The lawsuit, Queen “B” Productions v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A”, Case No. 1:26-cv-13614 (read the complaint), was filed on November 3, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

The complaint targets online storefronts allegedly selling unauthorized merchandise bearing the ELVIRA and MISTRESS OF THE DARK trademarks. The plaintiff identifies marketplaces including eBay, SHEIN, and Temu.

For sellers named in the lawsuit, the case raises concerns about potential account restrictions, frozen funds, and the legal consequences of trademark infringement allegations.

Queen B Productions Files Trademark Lawsuit Over Elvira Merchandise

Queen “B” Productions is a California-based company that owns trademark rights associated with Elvira: Mistress of the Dark, the horror entertainment character portrayed by Cassandra Peterson.

The character has appeared in television, films, and other entertainment productions and has become associated with a range of licensed merchandise.

According to the complaint, Queen “B” Productions and its licensees sell Elvira-branded products, including T-shirts, sweatshirts, posters, prints, magnets, pins, and other merchandise.

The company asserts rights in three federally registered trademarks:

• ELVIRA, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,330,838.

• ELVIRA MISTRESS OF THE DARK, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,315,637.

• MISTRESS OF THE DARK, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,175,886.

These registrations cover various goods and services, including clothing, Halloween costumes, printed materials, collectible figures, and entertainment services.

Queen “B” Productions alleges that the defendants used counterfeit versions of its trademarks to advertise and sell products without authorization.

The complaint also alleges that the sellers operated online storefronts targeting consumers in the United States, including Illinois, where the lawsuit was filed.

The plaintiff is represented by TME Law, P.C.

What Does the Queen B Productions Schedule A Lawsuit Allege?

The complaint asserts two claims under the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks and unfair competition.

The first claim concerns trademark infringement and counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1114.

Queen “B” Productions alleges that the defendants advertised, distributed, offered for sale, or sold products bearing counterfeit reproductions of its registered trademarks.

The second claim concerns false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

According to the complaint, the defendants' alleged use of the Elvira trademarks could cause consumers to believe that their products were authorized, sponsored, or approved by Queen “B” Productions.

The company further alleges that some sellers used its trademarks in product descriptions, website content, and metadata to attract consumers searching for Elvira merchandise.

Other sellers allegedly used product titles and descriptions designed to appear in relevant searches without directly including the protected trademarks.

These are allegations made by the plaintiff. The filing of a complaint does not establish that every named defendant committed trademark infringement.

Which Online Marketplaces Are Involved?

The complaint specifically identifies online stores operating through eBay, SHEIN, and Temu.

Queen “B” Productions alleges that sellers used these marketplaces to offer unauthorized products to consumers throughout the United States.

The complaint also claims that some defendants operated multiple seller aliases and used similar advertising and marketing methods.

However, the number of defendants named in the case remains, and the allegations against individual sellers may differ.

Online sellers should review the relevant court documents to determine whether their specific storefronts are included.

What Is Queen B Productions Seeking From the Court?

Queen “B” Productions is requesting several forms of relief against the defendants.

The complaint asks the court to prohibit defendants from using the Elvira trademarks in connection with unauthorized merchandise.

It also seeks restrictions against manufacturing, distributing, advertising, and selling products that allegedly infringe the company's trademark rights.

Additionally, the plaintiff requests that online marketplaces, including eBay, SHEIN, and Temu, disable advertisements associated with allegedly infringing products upon the plaintiff's request and subject to an applicable court order.

The company also seeks monetary relief, including profits allegedly earned through infringement, damages, attorneys' fees, and court costs.

As an alternative damages remedy, the complaint requests statutory damages of up to $2 million for each use of the Elvira trademarks under the cited willful counterfeiting provision.

This amount is a request made in the complaint, not a judgment against any individual seller.

The court would need to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to the requested relief.

Could the Queen B Productions Lawsuit Lead to Frozen Seller Funds?

One of the most significant concerns for defendants in Schedule A litigation is the possibility of having their marketplace funds frozen.

In these lawsuits, plaintiffs may request a temporary restraining order (TRO) that restricts certain activities while the case proceeds.

Depending on the terms of a court order, marketplaces and payment processors may be required to restrict seller accounts, disable listings, or temporarily freeze funds.

However, the complaint provided for this case does not establish that a TRO has been granted or that an asset freeze is currently in effect. The status of any TRO or asset-freeze order remains.

For online sellers, these restrictions can create substantial business difficulties, particularly when marketplace revenue is needed to pay suppliers, purchase inventory, or fulfill orders.

A temporary restriction does not automatically mean that the seller has lost the lawsuit.

For a more detailed explanation of how these cases work, sellers can read our guide, What Is a Schedule A Lawsuit and How to Fight It.

What Should Sellers Do If They Are Named in the Lawsuit?

If your online store has been identified in the Queen “B” Productions lawsuit, the first step is to confirm your involvement and review the relevant court documents.

A seller should determine whether their business or storefront appears on Schedule A, whether any court orders affect their accounts, and whether a deadline to respond has been established.

The current response deadlines and hearing dates for this case remain.

Failing to respond to a lawsuit when required can expose a defendant to a default judgment, potentially allowing the court to grant relief without the defendant presenting a defense.

However, being named in a lawsuit does not automatically mean that the plaintiff's allegations are correct.

Depending on the circumstances, defendants may have several legal options.

Negotiating a Settlement

Some sellers may choose to negotiate a settlement with the plaintiff.

A settlement can potentially resolve the claims against a particular defendant without continuing through all stages of litigation.

The terms may address monetary payments, future sales activities, and applicable account restrictions.

However, settlement terms vary, and an agreement does not guarantee immediate release of frozen funds or restoration of marketplace accounts.

Challenging the Trademark Allegations

Other sellers may have grounds to contest the plaintiff's claims.

Relevant considerations may include whether the products actually infringe the asserted trademarks, whether the seller had authorization to sell the merchandise, and what evidence supports the allegations.

Documents such as supplier invoices, product listings, purchase records, and communications may be important when evaluating a defense.

Challenging Jurisdiction or Other Procedural Issues

Some defendants may also have grounds to challenge whether the lawsuit can proceed against them in the Northern District of Illinois.

For example, a defendant may question whether the court has personal jurisdiction over their business.

Other potential defenses may involve improper joinder of unrelated defendants or problems with service of process.

These arguments depend on the specific circumstances and must be evaluated under the applicable procedural rules.

An attorney familiar with Schedule A litigation can assess whether any of these defenses are available.

Queen B Productions Joins Other Brands Pursuing Schedule A Litigation

The Queen “B” Productions lawsuit is another example of trademark owners using federal litigation to pursue alleged infringement across online marketplaces.

In recent months, several recognizable brands have filed similar lawsuits involving online sellers.

In September 2026, Nintendo filed a Schedule A lawsuit involving allegations of unauthorized merchandise associated with its intellectual property.

More recently, Manchester United filed a new Schedule A lawsuit in October 2026, targeting online sellers accused of offering counterfeit products bearing the football club's trademarks.

These cases involve different plaintiffs, intellectual property rights, and defendants. Nevertheless, they illustrate how Schedule A litigation continues to be used to address alleged infringement in online commerce.

For sellers, the important distinction is that each case must be evaluated individually.

A court order entered in one lawsuit does not automatically apply to another, and the allegations against one seller do not establish liability for every other defendant.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Queen B Productions Lawsuit

How do I know if my store is named in the Queen B Productions lawsuit?

Sellers can review the defendant list associated with Case No. 1:26-cv-13614 in the Northern District of Illinois. The complaint references a Schedule A identifying the defendants, but the list is not included in the provided complaint. An attorney can help determine whether a particular storefront is named.

Can Queen B Productions sue sellers based in China?

A U.S. trademark owner may file a lawsuit naming businesses located outside the United States. However, the court must have a valid legal basis to exercise jurisdiction over each defendant. Whether a particular seller has sufficient connections to Illinois depends on the facts and applicable law.

Are seller funds already frozen in this lawsuit?

The provided complaint does not confirm that a temporary restraining order or asset-freeze order has been issued. The current status must be verified through the court docket. Sellers experiencing account restrictions should review their marketplace notices and any applicable court orders to identify the reason for the restriction.

Can I settle the Queen B Productions lawsuit?

Settlement may be an option depending on the circumstances. A seller may be able to negotiate with the plaintiff to resolve the claims against their business. However, settlement terms vary, and any agreement should be reviewed carefully before acceptance.

What happens if I ignore the lawsuit?

Failing to respond by an applicable deadline can result in a default judgment. Depending on the court's findings, this may lead to monetary damages or other legal relief. Sellers who receive notice should review the documents promptly to understand their obligations and available options.

Facing the Queen B Productions Schedule A Lawsuit? Contact Stockman & Poropat

Being named in a federal trademark lawsuit can create uncertainty for online sellers, particularly when their businesses depend on access to marketplace accounts and revenue.

At Stockman & Poropat, PLLC, we represent e-commerce sellers facing Schedule A lawsuits, trademark infringement claims, account restrictions, and other legal disputes affecting their businesses.

Whether you operate on Amazon, eBay, Temu, Walmart, or another online marketplace, our attorneys can review your situation and help you understand your available options.

If your store has been named in the Queen “B” Productions lawsuit, contact our firm to discuss your circumstances.

Schedule a free consultation with Stockman & Poropat today.

Call 917-781-4186 or visit stockmanporopat.com.

Entrepreneurs for Entrepreneurs.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The outcome of any legal matter depends on its individual facts and circumstances.